期刊文献+

中重度晚发抑郁症患者的神经认知功能损害 被引量:24

Neurocognitive functioning impairment in patients with moderate to severe late-onset depression
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨晚发抑郁症患者的认知功能损害特征。方法:采用横断面研究,选取30例首次发病年龄≥60岁、符合疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类第十次修订本(ICD-10)"中、重度抑郁发作或复发"诊断标准的门诊及住院老年抑郁症患者为晚发抑郁症组,选取30例年龄、性别匹配的正常老年人作为正常对照组。使用威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、Stroop字色干扰测验、词语流畅性测验(VFT),对两组间定势转移、注意抑制、工作记忆等神经认知特点进行比较,应用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评定晚发抑郁症的抑郁严重程度。结果:与正常对照组相比,晚发抑郁症组WCST的错误应答数、持续性应答数、持续性错误数、持续性错误百分数的得分较高[(61±23)vs.(41±25),(44±27)vs.(27±19),(36±20)vs.(23±16),(28±15)vs.(19±11),均P<0.01],WCST的概念化水平应答百分数、Stroop一致组正确数、VFT的得分较低[(36±24)vs.(54±26),(19±3)vs.(20±2),(10±2)vs.(11±2),均P<0.01]。老年抑郁症组HAMD-17的阻滞因子与WCST的持续性应答数呈正相关(r=0.38,P<0.05),与Stroop一致组正确数呈负相关(r=-0.41,P<0.05),与VFT的分值呈负相关(r=-0.52,P<0.01)。结论:本研究提示中重度晚发抑郁症患者存在认知功能缺损,尤其是明显的执行功能损害。 Objective: To investigate the damaging traits of cognitive function in late-onset depression. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 elderly out- and in-patients whose first onset of major depression occurred at 60 years of age and older were included as the case group, and 30 age-and gender-matched normal elderly people were included as the controls. The diagnoses of moderate to severe depressive episode or recurrent depression were made according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop Test and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) were used to assess attentional set shifting, attentional inhibition and working memory. The severity of depression was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD-17). Results: The performance scores of errors, perseverative responses, perseverative errors, percent of perseverative errors in the WCST were significantly higher in the patient group then in the control group[ (61 ± 23) vs. (41 ± 25), (44 ± 27) vs. (27± 19), (36 ±20) vs. (23± 16), (28 ±15) vs. (19 ±11), P 〈0. 01]. The scores of conceptual level responses[ (36 ±24) vs. (54 ±26)], the correct scores of consistent group in Stroop test[(19 ±3) vs. (20 ±2)] and the scores of VFT in WCST[ ( 10 ±2) vs. ( 11 ± 2) ] were lower in the patient group than in the control group ( Ps 〈 0.01 ). The scores of perseverative responses in the WCST were positively Correlated with retardation factor scores(r = 0. 38, P 〈 0. 05). The correct scores of consistent group in the Stroop test were negatively correlated with retardation factor scores(r = -0.41, P 〈 0. 05). The scores of VFT were negatively correlated with retardation factor scores( r = - 0. 52, P 〈 0. 01). Conclusion: There may be impairment of cognitive function in late-onset depression, especially severe executive dysfunction.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期442-446,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 抑郁症 晚发 认知功能 神经心理学测验 depression late-onset cognitive function neuropsychological tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1刘登堂,江开达,徐一峰,诸索宇,施慎逊,王立伟,刘含秋,冯晓源,黎元.首发精神分裂症患者的功能磁共振初步研究[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(4):193-197. 被引量:13
  • 2杜静,汪凯,董毅.抑郁症的注意功能研究进展[J].国际精神病学杂志,2006,33(3):141-145. 被引量:28
  • 3许淑莲.成年人词语流畅性的年龄差异和词语记忆[J].心理学报,1989,21(4):337-345.
  • 4Fossati P, Coyette F, Ergis AM, et al. Influence of age and executive functioning on verbal memory of inpatients with depression. J AffectDisord, 2002, 68: 261-271.
  • 5Ellwart T, Rinck M, Becker ES. Selective memory and memory deficits in depressed inpatients. Depress Anxiety, 2003, 17:197-206.
  • 6Hammar A. Automatic and effortful information processing in unipolar major depression. Scand J Psychol, 2003, 44:409-413.
  • 7Ebmeier KP, Donaghey C, Steele D. Recent developments and current controversies in depression. Lancet, 2006, 367:153-167.
  • 8Videbech P, Ravnkilde B. Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-analysis of MRI studies. Am J Psychiatry, 2004, 161: 1957-1966.
  • 9Egeland J, Lund A, Landro NI, et al. Cortisol level predicts executive and memory function in depression, symptom level predicts psychomotor speed. Acta Psychiatr Stand, 2005, 112: 434-441.
  • 10Lockwood KA, Alexopoulos GS. Executive dysfunction in geriatric depression, Am J Psychiatry, 2002, 159:1119-1126.

共引文献125

同被引文献221

引证文献24

二级引证文献214

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部