期刊文献+

军事医学顶层本体语义类型框架的初步评价

Semantic type framework in top-level ontology of military medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析军事医学顶层本体语义类型的使用情况,以期发现目前语义类型的问题,使之向更加科学和全面的方向发展。方法基于数据驱动的方法,统计军事医学顶层本体语义类型在军事医学核心概念集中的使用频次。结果通过对语义类型的使用频次列表排序,对使用频次较高、较低和未被使用的语义类型进行对比分析。结论目前军事医学顶层本体的语义类型框架基本符合军事医学知识的表达,并可随着军事医学领域的发展不断更新和完善。 Objective To analyze the use of the semantic type of the top-level ontology of military medicine in order to find problems with the semantic type framework and make it more scientific and comprehensive. Methods Using data driven method,the frequency with which the semantic type of the top-level ontology of military medicine was used in military medical core concepts was statistically analyzed. Results By ranking the use frequency of the semantic types,the semantic types which had higher or lower frequency,and those that had never been used were analyzed. Conclusion The established semantic type framework of the top-level ontology of military medicine is basically consistent with the expression of military medical knowledge and can be constantly updated and improved with the development of military medicine.
出处 《军事医学》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期478-480,共3页 Military Medical Sciences
基金 军队后勤科技"十二五"重点资助项目(BS212J009) 解放军医学图书馆青年专项课题(2014250008)
关键词 军事医学 顶层本体 语义类型 统一医学语言系统 military medicine top-level ontology semantic type unified medical language system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1宋文,张剑,邵燕.顶层本体研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2006(1):43-45. 被引量:9
  • 2刘锦秀,丁如龄.《军用医学主题词表》评价及改进意见[J].情报学报,1996,15(4):278-285. 被引量:5
  • 3虞为,陈俊鹏,曹加恒.一种对语义网上本体进行检索和排序新方法[J].小型微型计算机系统,2007,28(6):1044-1048. 被引量:4
  • 4中国生物医学文献服务系统[EB/OL].http://SinoMed.imicams.cams.ac.cn/help,2009-05-13.
  • 5Borst W N. Construction of Engineering Ontoiogies for Knowl- edge Sharing and Reuse[ D]. PHD thesis,University of Twente, Enschede, 1997.
  • 6Y. Zhang, W. Vasconcelos and D. Sleeman, Ontosearch: An Ontology Search Engine[ C]. In Proc. 24th SGAI Int. Conf. on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artifial Intelligence, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  • 7Brank J, GrobelnikM, Mladcni D. A Survey of Ontology Evalu- ationTechniques[EB]. [2009-05-24]. http: //kt. ijs. si/dunja/sikdd200S/Papers/BrankEvaluationSiKDD2005, pdf.
  • 8Christopher Brewster, Hartith Alani, Srinandan Dasmahapatra, and Yorick Wilks, Data Driven Ontology Evaluation [ C ]. in Proceedings of LREC 2004, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • 9Gomez - PorezA. Evaluating ontologies : Cases of Study [ J ]. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications,2001 (3) :391 - 409.
  • 10N. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, S. Staab, R. Studer, Y. Sure. SEAL- A Framework for Developing SEmantic PortALs [ J ]. ACMK - CAP,2001 (10) :79-108.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部