摘要
本罪的增设突破了传统共同犯罪理论的束缚，可以满足网络帮助犯罪的规范评价要求。不过，对于网络技术帮助行为的刑法规制仍应保持必要的审慎与克制。网络技术帮助的提供者必须明知他人利用信息网络实施犯罪．这是网络技术帮助行为入罪的主观要件。其“明知”应当包括“确知”与“或知”两种，在法律事实层面均可体现为“实知”。网络技术帮助行为制造了法律所禁止的危险，则是其具备刑事可罚性的客观归责基础。至于是否制造了法律所禁止的危险，至少可从因果关系和价值衡量两个方面判断。网络技术帮助行为的入罪还须达到“情节严重”，可主要根据“明知＋通知＋不予改正”之规则来把握。
The addition of the crime breaks through the bondage of the traditional theory of common crime, and can meet the demands of normative evaluation of the cyber aiding criminal. However, the criminal regulation to helping behaviors by network technology should still maintain necessary prudence and restraint. Providers of network technology must clearly know that others use the information networks to commit crimes, which is the subjective element of helping behavior by network technology. ＂Clearly know＂ should include ＂know exactly＂ and ＂know probably＂ , which can be show as ＂know really＂ in legal field. The helping behaviors by network technology create the danger which the law forbids, which is the objective imputation basis with which the behaviors can be punished by criminal penalty. As to whether or not the behaviors actually create the dangers which are prohibited by the law, we can judge from two aspects namely causality and measurement of value at least. If helping behaviors by network technology constitute a crime, it must also meet the serious degree of ＂severe case＂ which we can grasp mainly based on the rule called ＂knowing ＋ notice ＋ not to correct＂.
作者
阴建峰
刘雪丹
Yin Jianfeng Liu Xuedan
出处
《刑法论丛》
CSSCI
2016年第4期211-235,共25页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
法教义学
明知
中立帮助行为
罪数
Law-dogmatics
Know clearly
Neutral helping behavior
Crime number
