摘要
英国和美国作为单一霸主国家,主导国际公共品供给的传统全球治理模式,因其未能广泛代表各国的共同意志和平等利益,终究不能提供真正意义上的公共品。随着世界经济及其贡献者的多极化,不仅传统的治理方式和格局不再是不可或缺,而且全球共治新模式的形成不可避免。因而,当今世界并不存在关于公共品供给真空或治理主导权交接的金德尔伯格陷阱。随着中国在世界经济中地位的不断提升,也必将积极参与全球治理,并代表新兴经济体和广大发展中国家争取更大的话语权。但是,这并不意味着中国要寻求霸主国家地位及其蕴涵的全球公共品供给者的主导地位。从努力为人类和平与发展事业做出更大贡献的愿望出发,中国愿意与世界各国分享其改革开放促进发展的成功经验,也有责任和能力提出关于全球减贫的中国方案,与各国人民一道,为破解被称作伊斯特利悲剧的反贫困难题贡献智慧和努力。
The traditional pattern of global governance characterized by the United Kingdom and the United States as successive hegemonic nations dominating the provisions of international public goods has in fact failed to supply meaningful public goods,because it is unable and not willing to represent common will and mutual interests of most of countries.As the world economy and its contributors become more and more pluralized,the traditional,hegemony-dominant governance model becomes no longer indispensable and a brand new,jointnomy model will inevitably form.Therefore,there does not exist so-called Kindleberger trap concerning the vacuum of public goods provisions or handing-over of leading power of governance in today’s world.As its status in the world economy lifts,China will be more actively involved in global governance and strive for greater voice for emerging economies and developing countries.It,however,does not imply that China is to seek hegemony status and its implicit exclusive role in supplying global public goods.In a bid to endeavor to contribute to peace and development of mankind,China is willing to share its experiences of success in reform and opening-up and resultant growth and inclusiveness.In particular,China is obligated and able to offer its wisdom,endeavor,and solution to eliminating world poverty,coping with what is called the Easterly tragedy.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第10期4-22,共19页
World Economics and Politics
关键词
全球公共品
全球贫困
中国方案
“一带一路”
international public goods
global poverty
China solution
the Belt and Road
