摘要
作为与不作为无论是从自然意义上还是从规范角度均难以绝对分割,"作为优先说"也存在一定的问题。传统理论针对案件事实,试图先区分作为与不作为,而后考察是否符合各自的成立条件。其实,作为与不作为是竞合关系,是两条可以用于入罪的进路,二者的成立条件不同,对应的证明要求也不同。在作为与不作为竞合的场合,应当遵循"竞合从重"的处理逻辑,在一个行为同时符合作为犯与不作为犯的场合,按照教义学上使得处罚更重的进路认定行为模式。
Commission and omission cannot be absolutely separate from each other in either the natural meaning or the specification perspective,while the theory of ＂behavior priority＂is also problematic. When faced with case facts,the classical theory starts to separate commission from omission and then proceeds to affirm whether they comply with their respective condition of establishment. As a matter of fact,commission and omission are in a relationship of contention and cooperation which,two means to confirm crimes,embrace different conditions of establishment and diverse needs of proofs. In a situation of the concurrence of commission and omission,efforts must be made to follow the logic of＂equal emphasis on logic concurrence＇; while in a context of an act complying with both commission and omission,more severe punishment should be meted out in line with the doctrines.
出处
《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第5期125-132,共8页
Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
作为
不作为
竞合
commission
omission
contention and cooperation
