期刊文献+

简政放权、企业活力与企业创新绩效 被引量:27

Streamline administration and delegate power to enterprise,enterprise vitality and enterprise innovation performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 在当前全面深化改革积极推进的背景下,学界缺乏从简政放权视角展开对政府行为影响企业创新绩效机制的理论和实证研究。本文基于国内外相关理论,以国内457家科技型中小企业作为研究对象,探讨了简政放权、企业活力与企业创新绩效三者间的关系,并采用实证方法验证了简政放权对企业创新绩效的影响机理。结果表明:简政放权可以分为减少繁文缛节("简政")和赋予企业自主性("放权")两个维度,二者均会对企业活力及企业创新绩效产生显著正向影响,且"简政"与"放权"的交互项也显著正向影响企业活力和企业创新绩效。此外,企业活力在"简政"与企业创新绩效关系间以及在"放权"与企业创新绩效关系间均发挥出部分中介作用,然而其在"放权"与创新绩效关系间的中介作用更显著。基于此,进一步总结了本研究的理论贡献及实践意义。 In the context of comprehensively deepening and actively promoting the reform,the academic world lacks theoretical and empirical studies on the influences of governmental behaviors on enterprise innovation performance from the perspective of streamlining administration and delegating power to enterprises. Based on the relevant theories,with 457 small and medium-sized technology-based enterprises in China as research object,the paper explores the relationship between streamlining administration and delegating power to enterprise,enterprise vitality and enterprise innovation performance. Besides,empirical approaches are applied to verify the influence mechanism of streamlining administration and delegating power to enterprise on enterprise innovation performance. As indicated by the results,streamlining administration and delegating power to enterprises can be divided into two dimensions,namely simplifying administrative procedures and giving autonomy to enterprises. Both of them can have a significantly positive influence on enterprise vitality and enterprise innovation performance. Furthermore,the interaction of "simplifying administrative procedures"and "giving autonomy to enterprises"also have a significantly positive influence on enterprise vitality and enterprise innovation performance. In addition,enterprise vitality plays part of the intermediary role in both the relationship between "simplifying administrative procedures"and enterprise innovation performance and the relationship between"giving autonomy to enterprises"and enterprise innovation performance,but it has a more significant intermediary role when it comes to the relationship between"giving autonomy to enterprises"and enterprise innovation performance. On this basis,the paper further summarizes the theoretical contribution and practical significance of this study.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1737-1749,共13页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(13JZD015) 西北工业大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(31020170QD107)
关键词 简政放权 企业活力 企业创新绩效 科技型中小企业 streamline administration and delegate power to enterprise enterprise vitality enterprise innovation performance small and medium -sized technology- based enterprises
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献119

  • 1马艳艳,刘凤朝,姜滨滨,王元地.企业跨组织研发合作广度和深度对创新绩效的影响——基于中国工业企业数据的实证[J].科研管理,2014,35(6):33-40. 被引量:63
  • 2郑梅莲,宝贡敏.中小企业技术来源的选择——基于浙江省中小企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(6):949-955. 被引量:6
  • 3彼得·德鲁克.管理的前沿[M].上海:上海译文出版社.1999
  • 4[德]迈诺尔夫·迪尔科斯等.《组织学习与知识创新》,上海人民出版社,2001年版.
  • 5李晓春.《信息技术与企业组织结构》(博士论文),北京,中国社科院工业经济研究所,2000年版.
  • 6[丹麦]尼古莱.福斯.《企业万能:面向企业能力理论》,大连,东北财经大学出版社,1998年版.
  • 7[日]青木昌彦.“硅谷模式的信息与治理结构”,《走出误区,经济学家论说硅谷模式》(钱颖一主编),北京,中国经济出版社,2000年版.
  • 8A.K.Gupta & V.Govindarajam, 1991, Knowledge Flows and the Structme of Control within Multinational Corporations,Academy of Management Review, 16: 768-92.
  • 9B. Wernerfelt, 1984, A Resource-based View of Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.5.
  • 10C.K.Prahalad & Gary Hamel, 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June.

共引文献726

同被引文献547

引证文献27

二级引证文献198

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部