期刊文献+

不同麻醉方法对直肠癌患者腹腔镜术中、术后的影响 被引量:2

The Intraoperative and Postoperative Effect of Different Anesthesia Methods on Laparoscopic Colorectal Carcinoma Surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究全身麻醉方法与全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉方法对直肠癌患者腹腔镜术中、术后的影响。方法随机选取96例行直肠癌腹腔镜术患者作为研究对象,随机分为研究组(全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉组)与对照组(全身麻醉组),对比两组患者围手术期不良发应发生率以及麻醉效果。结果研究组的不良反应率为29.17%,低于对照组72.92%的不良反应率(P<0.05);研究组与对照组麻醉效果对比差异不存在统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉可在腹腔镜直肠癌根手术获得较好的术中、术后效果。 Objective To explore the intraoperative and postoperative effect of general anesthesia and general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on laparoscopic colorectal carcinoma surgery.Methods 96 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal carcinoma surgery were enrolled as the research object,randomly divided into study group(general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia) and control group(general anesthesia),perioperative adverse response and the effect of anesthesia were compared between two groups.Results The adverse reaction rate in study group was 29.17%,lower than 72.92%of control group(P〈0.05); anesthesia effect between the study group and the control group had no significant difference(P〈0.05).Conclusion Epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia can achieve better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal carcinoma surgery.
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第26期128-129,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 全身麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 腹腔镜直肠癌手术 general anesthesia epidural anesthesia taparoscopic colorectalcarcinoma surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献50

  • 1杨现会,程静林,吕淼淼,董铁立.不同麻醉方法对直肠癌患者围术期免疫功能的影响[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(15):37-38. 被引量:5
  • 2高玉亮,胡志向,韩希文,刘桂秀.两种麻醉方法对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中应激反应变化的比较[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2007,21(11):850-851. 被引量:14
  • 3胡志向,高玉亮,韩希文,刘桂秀,葛秀娟,李梦良,徐建,肖古华.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同麻醉方法对应激反应的影响[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2007,12(5):438-440. 被引量:19
  • 4Mukhtar K, Singh S. Transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth,2009,102(1) : 143-144.
  • 5McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, et al. The analgesic effi- cacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean de- livery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106(1) : 186-191.
  • 6McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg, 2007,104(1) : 193-197.
  • 7McDonnell JG, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block. Anesth Analg, 2007,105 (3) : 883.
  • 8Wu Y, Liu F, Tang H, et al. The analgesic efficacy of sub- costal transversus abdominis plane block compared with tho- racic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy. Anesth Analg, 2013, 117(2):507-513.
  • 9Walter CJ, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Pinkney TD, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of ultrasound- guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparo- scopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27 (7): 2366-2372.
  • 10Niraj G, Kelkar A, Hart E, et al. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and continuous posterior TAP analgesia with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic eolorectal sur- gery: an open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial. An- aesthesia, 2014, 69(4):348-355.

共引文献197

同被引文献21

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部