期刊文献+

真的是“冤有头债有主”吗?基于群体冲突的替代性报复 被引量:4

Every injustice has its perpetrator?Inter-group vicarious retribution
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 群际替代性报复是指群体内成员受到外群体成员的伤害后,内群体的其他成员对外群体的其他成员进行报复的现象。这种基于群体水平上的替代性报复很大程度上已经超越了原本的侵犯者和受害者,而涉及到群体双方更大范围的其他人。替代性报复是一个复杂的心理过程,其产生和程度受到伤害感知、群体认同、外群体实体性、群体情绪以及内群观众效应的影响。内群体在实施替代性报复后也往往存在较为一致的"正面"认知评价和情感体验。未来还需要继续在学术层面上整合和完善替代性报复的心理机制,探讨不同文化观念下替代性报复的特点,最重要的是结合社会现实提出减少替代性报复的策略。 Inter-group vicarious retribution is the phenomenon whereby, after an out-group member attacks an in-group member, a member of the victim's group retaliates against a member of the perpetrator's group. Group-based vicarious retribution has largely gone beyond the original offenders and victims, and involves a wider range of other people in the group. Vicarious retribution is a complex psychological process, and its occurrence and extent are influenced by many fators. Perceived injury, in-group identification, out-group entitativity, group emotions and in-group audience effect are predictors of vicarious retribution. After the implementation of vicarious retaliation, the in-group members often has "positive" cognitive assessment and emotional experience. In the future, we need to integrate the psychological mechanisms of vicarious retribution, explore whether the different cultural values and religions idea can affect the possibility of vicarious retribution occurring, and the most important work is putting forward proposals to reduce vicarious retribution in society.
作者 艾娟
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1964-1971,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目:间接群际接触改善群体态度研究(15CSH014)
关键词 群体冲突 替代性报复 群体报复 群际关系 group conflict inter-group vicarious retribution group retribution group relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献177

  • 1Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 86(1), 52-59.
  • 2Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-658.
  • 3Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25(5), 607-631.
  • 4Beehwati, N. N., & Morrin, M. (2003). Outraged consumers: Getting even at the expense of getting a good deal. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 440-453.
  • 5Bellah, C. G., Bellah, L. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2003). A look at dispositional vengefulness from the Three and Five-Factor Models of Personality. Individual Differences Research, 1(1), 6-16.
  • 6Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers in Theory and Research (pp. 246-260), Thousand Oaks, California, US: Sage Publications.
  • 7Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2005). The study of revenge in the workplace: Conceptual, ideological, empirical issues. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations o factors and targets (pp. 65-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • 8Brown, B. R. (1968). The effects of need to maintain face on interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 107-122.
  • 9Brown, R. P. (2004). Vengeance is mine: Narcissism, vengeance and the tendency to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 576-584.
  • 10Brown, R. P., & Phillips, A. (2005). Letting bygones be bygones: Further evidence for the validity of the tendency to forgive scale. Personality and Individual Differences,38,627-638.

共引文献83

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部