期刊文献+

磁共振扩散张量成像在前列腺癌病理分级中的应用 被引量:1

Application of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in pathological grading of prostate cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨磁共振扩散张量成像(Diffusion tensor imaging,DTI)在前列腺癌(Prostate cancer,PCa)病理分级中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析40例PCa患者的临床资料,应用Gleason评分进行分级。患者均行DTI检查,测定各向异性分数(Fractional anisotropy,FA)和表观弥散系数(Apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC),分析FA值、ADC值与患者Gleason评分的关系。结果:低级别组DTI图表现为纤维束排列稠密、未见中断;中级别组DTI图显示纤维束排列紊乱、稀疏;高级别组DTI图显示纤维束中断;低级别组、中级别组和高级别组FA值逐渐升高,ADC值逐渐减小(P<0.05);ADC值和Gleason评分呈负相关,FA值和Gleason评分呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论:磁共振扩散张量成像可作为无创评估PCa患者病理分级的重要指标。 Objective: To investigate application values of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging( DTI) in pathological grading of prostate cancer( PCa). Methods: The clinical data of 40 patients with PCa were retrospectively analyzed. The Gleason score was used for grading. All the patients underwent DTI examination. The fractional anisotropy( FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient( ADC) were measured. The relationships among the FA value,ADC value and patient Gleason score were analyzed. Results: The DTI patterns in the low-grade group showed dense fiber bundles with no disruption; the middle-grade DTI patterns showed disarranged and sparse fiber bundles; and the high-grade group DTI showed interrupted fiber bundles. The FA values of the low-grade,middle-grade and high-grade groups gradually increased,while the ADC values gradually decreased( P<0.05). Further,the FA value was positively correlated with Gleason score,while the ADC value was negatively correlated with Gleason score( P<0.05). Conclusions: DTI can be used as a noninvasive and an important assessment tool for PCa pathological grading.
作者 葛延平 张磊
机构地区 新乡市中心医院
出处 《中国民康医学》 2018年第2期92-93,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 磁共振扩散张量成像 前列腺癌 GLEASON评分 Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging Prostate cancer Gleason score
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.不同年龄段正常成人前列腺外周带ADC值的初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(12):1496-1499. 被引量:16
  • 2Wu CL,Jordan KW, Ratai EM, et al. Metabolomic imaging for human prostate cancer detection. Sci-ence Translational Med,2010,2 : 16 Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines. Eur Radiol,2012 ,22 :746.
  • 3Gtirses B, Kabakci N, Kovanlikaya A, et al, Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol,2008,18:716.
  • 4Tamada T, Sone T, Toshimitsu S, et al. Age-related and zonal ana- tomical changes of" apparent dif- fusion coefficient values ix normal human prostatic tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging,2008,27:552.
  • 5Gtirses B,Tasdelen N,Yencilek F,et al. Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. EuJ Radio1,2011,79 :172.
  • 6Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristic of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med ,2009,61:842.
  • 7Manenti G, Carlani M, Mancino S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonace imaging of prostate-cancer. Invest Radio1,2007 ,42 :412.
  • 8Reischauer C, Wilm B J, Froehlich .IM, et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer using a reduced FOV Technique. Eur J Radio1,2011,80:34.
  • 9Gibbs P, Liney GP, Pickles MD, et al. Correlation of ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla. In- vest Radio1,2009 ,44 :572.
  • 10Nagarajan R, Nargolis D, Raman S,et al. MR Spectroscopic Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer With Gleason Scores. J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,36:697.

共引文献44

同被引文献14

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部