摘要
目前的中国学界的"高句丽文化"研究呈现出新视角、新方法和新观点的研究态势,但是与韩国学界的相关研究相比还有一定的差距,这种差距是由双方不同的国家学术环境造成的,韩国将高句丽史视作"国史"予以研究,投入了极高的关注度和支持力度,而高句丽史在中国只是古代东北史中的一部分而已,因此才造成了双方重视程度的巨大差异。日本对"高句丽文化"方面的研究多偏重于墓葬和城址的研究,而朝鲜也因国内高句丽遗迹丰富的优势多注重考古文化的研究,但是因其特殊的政治氛围,使其对传世文献的解读过于随意和偏激,与韩国多种观点林立的态势不同,虽然二者都受民族主义情绪影响,但朝鲜学界的高句丽文化研究呈现出偏执性和单一性特点。
The recent research of ＂Gaogouli Culture＂ in Chinese academic circles presents a new perspec- tive, new method and new viewpoint, but compared with the related research of Korean academ- ic circles, there still exists a certain gap. Two different national academic environments give rise to the gap. Korean academic circles gives great support and attention on the research of ＂Gao- gouli Culture＂ history, and treat it as a national history research, but in China the history of Gao- gouli is only a part of the ancient northeast history. The gap was caused by two different atten- tions. The research on ＂Gaogouli Culture＂ in Japan mainly focuses on the study of burial and city site, while in North Korea, there axe a lot of Gaogouli historical remains, so they pay more attention on the research of archaeological culture. Because of the special political atmosphere, the literature interpretation is too arbitrary and extreme in North Korea. This is different with Korea which has many different views on literature interpretation. Although both them axe influ- enced by nationalism, the research of ＂Gaogouli Culture＂ in North Korea has the characteristics of paranoia and singleness.
作者
董健
孙炜冉
李乐营
DONG Jian;SUN Wei-ran;LI Le-ying(Research Institute of Gaogouli, Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua, Jilin 134002, China)
出处
《通化师范学院学报》
2018年第5期24-33,共10页
Journal of Tonghua Normal University
基金
国家社科基金“高句丽、渤海问题”研究专项项目“高句丽文化研究”(17VGB009)
吉林省教育厅“十三五”社会科学研究规划项目“国家新型智库建设背景下高句丽研究成果的拓展、利用与转化”(吉教科文合字[2016]239)
关键词
高句丽文化
中国
日本
韩国
朝鲜
Gaogouli culture
China
Japan
Korean
North Korean
