摘要
目的:对比现察头皮针与药物治疗经前期紧张综合征的临床疗效,寻找治疗该病的最佳方法。方法:将66例病人随机分成头皮针组35例、药物组31例,头皮针组主穴取额中线、顶中线,再根据不同的症状配穴治疗;药物组口服安宫黄体酮,治疗3月观察比较2组的疗效。结果:头皮针组与药物组疗效比较,差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。结论:头皮针治疗该病的临床疗效优于药物。
Purpose To compare clinical theapeutic effects of scalp acupuncture and medicine for treatment of premenstrual tension syndrome to search the best therapy for it. Methods 66 cases were randomly divided into scalp acupuncture group (35 cases) and medication group (31 cases). For the scalp acupuncture group the Middle Line of Forehead and the Middle Line of Vertex were selected as main points, and adjuvant points according to different symptoms, and the medication group were treated with oral administration of provera, for 3 months. Results There was a significant difference between the two groups in the therapeutic effect (P < 0.05). Conclusion The clinical therapeutic effect of the scalp acupuncture is better than that of the medication for premenstrual tension syndrome.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2002年第9期597-598,共2页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
