摘要
实质合理性的当代论证是与对合理性的认识论辩护、对批判性思维的阐发和对相对主义的反驳紧密联系起来的。实质合理性可以被理解为:基于可中立判断和评价的"好理由"由批判性思维所主导,个体在认知和行动中以理性评判和道德评价相结合的方式来实际建构的合理性。
The contemporary argument for substantial rationality relates to epistemological justification for rationality, exploration of critical thinking, and justification for anti-relativism. Substantial rationality can be defined as neutrally judged and evaluated" good reasons", which is leaded by critical thinking. It is a kind of rationality that can be constructed by the individual through conforming to the epistemic and moral norms.
出处
《哲学分析》
CSSCI
2018年第3期94-104,198,共11页
Philosophical Analysis
关键词
实质合理性
批判性思维
命题式辩护
信念式辩护
合情理性
substantial rationality
critical thinking
propositional justification
doxastic justification
epistemological relativism
reasonableness
