期刊文献+

超声引导下改良髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年股骨近端骨折麻醉中的应用 被引量:34

Clinical application of modified ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block for upper femur fractures surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察超声引导下改良髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年股骨近端骨折手术中的麻醉效果。方法选择股骨近端骨折拟行人工股骨头置换术或股骨近端髓内钉手术的老年患者60例,男22例,女38例,年龄65~99岁,BMI 18.6~29.7kg/m2,ASAⅠ-Ⅳ级。采用随机数字表法将其分为两组:单纯全麻组(GA组)和全麻联合神经阻滞组(GB组),每组30例。两组均给予咪达唑仑、依托咪酯、舒芬太尼及顺式阿曲库铵麻醉诱导后行喉罩全麻,GB组在全麻后,经超声引导给予0.5%罗哌卡因30ml进行改良髂筋膜间隙阻滞。记录入室时(T0)、置入人工气道即刻(T1)、手术开始5min(T2)、手术结束时(T3)的HR、SBP、DBP;记录术中麻醉药物的用量、手术时间、麻醉苏醒时间、人工气道拔除时间、拔除30min和出恢复室时的Ramsay镇静评分;记录术后第一次补救镇痛时间、补救镇痛使用次数、血管活性药物使用总次数;记录术后2、6、12、24和48h静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟疼痛(VAS)评分。记录术后48h恶心、呕吐发生情况。结果与T0时比较,T1时两组HR明显减慢,SBP、DBP均明显降低,T2时GA组SBP明显升高(P<0.05)。与GA组比较,GB组麻醉过程中舒芬太尼、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量明显减少(P<0.05),苏醒时间、人工气道拔除时间明显缩短(P<0.05),拔管30min时Ramsay镇静评分明显降低(P<0.05),第一次补救镇痛时间明显延长(P<0.05),补救镇痛使用次数和血管活性药物使用总次数明显减少(P<0.05),术后2、6和12h静息和咳嗽时VAS评分均明显降低(P<0.05)。两组术后恶心呕吐差异无统计学意义。结论在老年股骨近端骨折手术中采用全麻联合改良髂筋膜间隙阻滞,具有术中减少全麻药物的用量、术后恢复佳、术后镇痛效果好等优点。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified injection technique of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block for upper femur fracture surgeries in the elderly.Methods Sixty patients aged 65-99 years,22 males and 38 females,BMI 18.6-29.7 kg/m2,ASAⅠ-Ⅳlevel,scheduled for artificial femoral head replacement and PFNA operation were randomly divided into two groups(n=30 each):general anesthesia group(group GA)and fascia iliaca compartment block with general anesthesia group(group GB).The two groups were induced by midazolam,etomidate,sufentanil and cis atracurium,and then in group GB,modified fascia iliaca compartment block with ultrasound-guided was performed,and 0.5% ropivacaine 30 ml was given.HR,SBP and DBP were recorded at the time of entering operating room,placing the laryngeal mask,5 min after surgery and the end of the surgery(T0-T3).The total usage of anesthetics were calculated.The operation time,recovery time,extraction of artificial airway time,Ramsay sedation score at extubation 30 min and recovery room,vasoactive drugs during operation,postoperative rescue analgesic requirements were recorded.Postoperative VAS score at 2,6,12,24 and 48 h,and postoperative nausea and vomiting were also recorded.Results Compared with T0,the HR,SBP and DBP were significantly decreased at T1 in both groups,and the SBP were significantly increased at T2 in group GA and higher than in group GB(P〈0.05).The dosage of sufentanil,propofol and remifentanil in group GB were less than those in group GA,the recovery time,extubation time in group GB were shorter than those in group GA,Ramsay sedation score 30min after extubation in group GB were lower than those in group GA(P〈0.05),the time of the first rescue application analgesics in group GB were longer than those in group GA(P〈0.05).Compared with group GA,the scores of the VAS in silence and coughing at 2h,6h,12hafter operation in group GB were significant lower than those in group GA(P〈0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.Conclusion Modified injection technique of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block can ensure stable hemodynamics,reduce the dosage of anesthetic drugs,less side effects,better recovery and more indications in general anesthesia for upper femur fracture surgeries.
作者 音樱 章敏 疏树华 谷海 谢言虎 徐磊 方诗元 柴小青 YIN Ying;ZHANG Min;SHU Shuhua;GU Hai;XIE Yanhu;XU Lei;FANG Shiyuan;CHAI Xiaoqing(Department of Anesthesiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230001,China)
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期660-664,共5页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 超声 髂筋膜间隙阻滞 全身麻醉 术后镇痛 Ultrasund Fascia iliaca compartment block General anesthesia Postoperative an- algesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献90

  • 1刘俊杰 赵俊.现代麻醉学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.686-709.
  • 2李功宋(译) 李佳音 等.体外循环中的内分泌、体液及代谢反应.体外循环灌注学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.176.
  • 3夏正远,顾家珍,林芳华,胡岚,余金甫,方建国.体外循环下心肌缺血再灌注后血清过氧化脂质及前列腺素的变化[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1997,13(2):82-83. 被引量:5
  • 4National Clinical Guideline Centre. The Management of Hip Fracture in Adults [ EB/OL ]. London: ( 2011 ) [ 2014-7-15 ]. http ://www. nice. org. uk/nicemedia/live/13489/54918/54918. pdf.
  • 5Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of hip fracture in older people [ EB/OL ]. Edinburgh: (2009-6-1) [ 2014-7-15]. http ://www. sign. ac. uk/pdf/sigul 11. pdf.
  • 6Mak JC, Cameron ID, March LM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of hip fractures in older persons : an update[J]. MedJAust, 2010, 192(1) :37-41.
  • 7American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeions. Management of hip fracture in elderly [ EB/OL]. Rosemont: ( 2014-9-5 ) [ 2014-9- 15 ]. http ://www. aaos. org/Research/guidelines/ HipFxGuideline. pdf.
  • 8Sircar P, Godkar D, Mahgerefleh S, et al. Morbidity and mortality among patients with hip fractures surgically repaired within and after 48 hours [J]. Am J Ther, 2007, 14(6):508- 513.
  • 9Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression [ J]. Can J Anaesth, 2008, 55(3) : 146-154.
  • 10Mclaughlin MA, Orosz GM, Magaziner J, et al. Preoperative status and risk of complications in patients with hip fracture[ J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2006, 21 ( 3 ) : 219-225.

共引文献366

同被引文献309

引证文献34

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部