摘要
彭宣维在韩礼德传统及物性模型的基础上提出了新及物性模型,修正了传统模型中的不足。但在新模型中,过程类型这一传统模型的核心内容被隐去了。对此,笔者尝试将新旧模型进行对接:一方面,采用全新范畴化标准逐层对过程类型进行划分,在保留过程类型的同时,规避传统模型中个别过程类型相互交叉的问题;另一方面,延续新模型中将世界经验与语言表征相分开的模式,更为准确地揭示世界经验与其语言表征之间的运作机制。
On the base of Halliday＇s traditional model of transitivity system,Peng Xuanwei proposed a new model,which is an amendment to the traditional one.However,process types,which function as the main content in the traditional model,are deleted in the new model.Therefore,this paper tries to make an abutment of the two models.On one hand,classify the world experience in different categorization criteria layer by layer,so as to avoid the overlap between certain process types in the traditional model.On the other hand,maintain the mode of separating world experience from its lingual representation suggested in the new model,so as to reveal more correctly the operational mechanism between world experience and its lingual representation.
作者
李雪娇
LI Xue-jiao(Mudanjiang Normal University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157000, Chin)
出处
《牡丹江师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2018年第4期122-130,共9页
Journal of Mudanjiang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(17CYY039)
黑龙江省教育科学"十二五"规划课题(GJC1215073)
黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(16WWE04)
牡丹江师范学院教学改革项目(16-JG18012)
关键词
传统模型
新模型
及物性系统
对接
traditional model
new model
transitivity system
abutment
