摘要
目的 :对比分析采用气压弹道碎石术(UPL)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效。方法 :择取2014年5月至2017年5月四川省遂宁市第三人民医院泌尿外科收治的102例输尿管结石患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法将其分为对照组和研究组。为对照组患者施行体外冲击波碎石术,为研究组患者施行气压弹道碎石术,然后比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果 :研究组患者的结石排净率高于对照组患者,P <0.05。研究组患者术后血尿的发生率高于对照组患者,P <0.05。两组患者其他术后并发症的发生率相比,P> 0.05。结论 :与采用体外冲击波碎石术相比,采用气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效更为显著。
objective： to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of pneumatic lithotripsy（UPL） and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy（ESWL） in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Methods： a total of 102 patients with ureteral calculi admitted to the urology department of the third people＇s hospital of suining, sichuan province from May 2014 to May 2017 were selected as study subjects, and were divided into control group and study group by using random number table method. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was performed for the control group and pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy for the study group. Results： the stone removal rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group, P 0.05. The incidence of postoperative hematuria in the study group was higher than that in the control group, P 0.05. Compared with other postoperative complications, P was 0.05. Conclusion： compared with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, the clinical effect of pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi is more remarkable.
作者
郑红春
Zheng hongchun(urology department,no.3 people＇s hospital,suining,sichuan,62900)
关键词
气压弹道碎石术
体外冲击波碎石术
输尿管结石
临床疗效
pneumatic lithotripsy
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Ureteral calculi
Clinical curative effect
