期刊文献+

基于加权TOPSIS法的癌痛规范化治疗合理性评价 被引量:23

Rational evaluation of standardized treatment for cancer pain based on weighted TOPSIS method
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:建立某院癌痛规范化治疗合理性评价细则,通过加权TOPSIS法对该院肿瘤科癌痛规范化治疗情况进行评价。方法:以卫生部颁布的《癌症疼痛诊疗规范(2011年版)》、2017年版《癌症疼痛诊疗上海专家共识》、欧洲临床肿瘤学会《癌症疼痛指南(2012年版)》、临床使用止痛药物说明书作为参考。在查阅相关文献基础上,该院多学科讨论制定癌痛规范化合理性评价细则,并据此采用加权TOPSIS法对该院2017年下半年的30例癌痛病历进行评价。结果:在评价的30份病历中相对接近度大于60%的有22例(占73.3%),相对接近度在50%~60%之间的有7例(占23.3%),相对接近度在40%~50%之间的1例(占3.3%)。结论:基于加权TOPSIS法制定的癌痛规范化治疗合理性评价方法把影响癌痛规范化治疗的多个因素结合起来,相对传统单个指标评价,其结果更加简明扼要、直观、可靠。 OBJECTIVE To establish a weighted TOPSIS method for evaluating the standardized treatment for cancer patient,and evaluate the standardized treatment of cancer pain in oncology department. M ETHODS The reasonable application evaluation system of the standardized treatment for cancer patient was established based on weighted TOPSIS by reference to "Practice for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Pain( 2 0 1 1 edition) ","Shanghai Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Pain"in 2 0 1 7,"Management of Cancer Pain: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines",and instructions for clinical use of analgesic drugs. Multidisciplinary discussion was performed to formulate rules for rational evaluation of cancer pain based on weighted TOPSIS in our hospital based on the related literature. Thirty cancer pain cases happened in the second half of 2 0 1 7 in our hospital were evaluated. RESULTS Among 3 0 cases,there were 2 2 cases with a relative proximity of more than 6 0 %( 7 3. 3 %),7 cases between 5 0 % and 6 0 %( 2 3. 3 %),1 case between 4 0 % and 5 0 %( 3. 3 %).CONCLUSION The rationalization evaluation of cancer pain based on the weighted TOPSIS method combines multiple factors that affect the standardized treatment of cancer pain. The evaluation results are more concise,intuitive and reliable compared to the traditional single index evaluation method.
作者 宋佳伟 张庆 徐珊珊 刘建刚 陈慧娟 曾诚 SONG Jia-wei;ZHANG Qing;XU Shan-shan;LIU Jian-gang;CHEN Hui-juan;ZENG Cheng(Department of Pharmacy;Department of Oncology,People's Hospital of Bozhou,Anhui Bozhou 236800,China)
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第17期1856-1859,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 加权TOPSIS法 癌痛规范化治疗 评价细则 合理性评价 weighted TOPSIS method standardized treatment of cancer pain detailed evaluation rules rationality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1张晓琳,焦明丽,王国栋,黄照权,吴群红,张靖婧,张弛,刘鹤,赵思奇,梁立波,康正,邢凯.基于TOPSIS法的某省新医疗改革中政府相关责任的分析[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(6):22-24. 被引量:10
  • 2Breivik H,Cherny N,Collett F,et al.Cancer-related pain:a pan European survey of prevalence,treatment,and patient attitudes.Ann Oncol,2009,20:1420-1433.
  • 3Frankish H.15 million new cancer cases per year by2020,says WHO.Lancet,2003,361:1278.
  • 4Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH,de Rijke JM,Kessels AG,et al.Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer:a systematic review of the past 40 years.Ann Oncol,2007,18:1437-1449.
  • 5Deandrea S,Montanari M,Moja L,et al.Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain.A review of published literature.Ann Oncol,2008,19:1985-1991.
  • 6Costantini M,Ripamonti C,Beccaro M,et al.Prevalence,distress,management and relief of pain during the last three months of cancer patients’life.Results of an Italian mortality follow-back survey.Ann Oncol,2009,20:729-735.
  • 7Wang XS,Mendoza TR,Gao SZ,et al.The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory(BPI-C):its development and use in a study of cancer pain.Pain.1996,67:407-416.
  • 8周彩存,王禄化,周道安.肿瘤学.上海:同济大学出版社,2010,187.
  • 9Caraceni A,Portenoy RK.An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes.IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain.International Association for the Study of Pain.Pain,1999,82:263-274.
  • 10Laird B,Colvin L,Fallon M.Management of cancer pain:basic principles and neuropathic cancer pain.Eur J Cancer,2008,44:1078-1082.

共引文献87

同被引文献258

引证文献23

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部