期刊文献+

关节镜下用缝合锚钉固定软组织治疗肩关节不稳的效果及远期预后

The efficacy and long-term prognosis of the treating shoulder joint instability with suture anchor
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究关节镜下用缝合锚钉固定软组织治疗肩关节不稳的效果及远期预后。方法:纳入我院2013年1月-2015年12月肩关节不稳患者120例并根据随机数字表法分为均等两组,每一组均有60例,所有患者经关节镜、体格等检查确诊,均为陈旧性损伤,两组的一般资料差异不显著。A组采用保守方法治疗,B组关节镜下用缝合锚钉固定软组织治疗。比较两组患者治疗优良率;1年复发率;治疗前和治疗后患者疼痛评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈和外旋角度的差异。结果:B组治疗优良率93.33%显著比A组75.00%高,P<0.05;B组1年复发率0.00%相较于A组1年复发率10.00%更低,P<0.05;治疗前两组疼痛评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈和外旋角度相似,其中,B组分别为(5.37±1.72)分、(4.05±0.22)分、(65.48±10.62)°、(17.41±2.61)°,A组分别为(5.35±1.76)分、(4.06±0.21)分、(65.46±10.61)°、(17.13±2.61)°,P>0.05;治疗后B组相较于A组疼痛评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈和外旋角度改善更显著,其中,B组分别为1.18±0.21分、9.52±1.59分、(143.97±12.68)°、(32.01±7.24)°,A组分别为(2.01±0.59)分、(7.98±0.34)分、(102.57±10.69)°、(24.13±4.13)°,P<0.05。结论:关节镜下用缝合锚钉固定软组织治疗肩关节不稳的效果确切,远期复发率低,可有效恢复肩关节活动度和功能,减轻患者疼痛,值得推广。 Objective:To study the effect of arthroscopic fixation of shoulder joint instability.Methods:120patients were divided into two groups,60patients in each.Group B was treated with suture anchor soft fixation.Results:The excellent and efficacy of group B was93.33%higher than that of group A75.00%(P<0.05).The recurrence rate of group B was0.00%lower than that of group A.Compared with group A,pain score,SST score,shoulder flexion and external rotation were more significant in treatment group B,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Arthroscopic fixation of soft tissue with suture anchor is effective in the treating shoulder instability.
出处 《中医临床研究》 2017年第9期82-83,共2页 Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词 关节镜下 缝合锚钉固定软组织 肩关节不稳 效果 远期预后 Arthroscopy Suture anchor fixation soft tissue Shoulder joint instability Effect Long-term prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献145

  • 1李彦林,王国梁,何川,李建,郑家礼,陈广超,李松,余洋.关节镜下治疗创伤复发性Bankart损伤疗效分析[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(4):219-224. 被引量:6
  • 2赵明,吕天增,唐兰,谢明.新兵军事训练伤调查分析[J].北京军区医药,2000,12(4):300-301. 被引量:5
  • 3朱以明,姜春岩,王满宜.复发性肩关节前方不稳定的诊断与治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(2):166-171. 被引量:23
  • 4Scheibel M, Tsynman A, Magosch P, et al. Postoperative subscapularis muscle insufficiency after primary and revision open shoulder stabilization. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34 : 1586-1593.
  • 5Lenters q'R, Franta AK, Wolf FM, et al. Arthroseopic compared with open repairs for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and recta-analysis of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89:244-254.
  • 6Carreira DS, Mazzocca AD, Oryhon J, et al. A prospective outcome evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: minimum 2- year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34:771-777.
  • 7Cho NS, Hwang JC, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic stabilization in anterior shoulder instability: collision athletes versus noncollision athletes. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22:947-953.
  • 8Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, et al. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroseopy, 2004, 20:456-462.
  • 9Kim SH, Ha KI, Cho YB, et al. Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85:1511-1518.
  • 10Mazzocca AD, Brown FM Jr, Carreira DS, et al. Arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization of collision and contact athletes. Am J Sports Med, 2005, 33:52.60.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部