期刊文献+

帝视内镜与视频喉镜在颈椎手术困难气管插管的临床应用比较 被引量:2

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较帝视内镜和视频喉镜在颈椎手术困难气管插管中的应用效果。方法:选择择期评估为困难气道的颈椎手术患者60例,随机分成帝视内镜组(D组)和视频喉镜组(E组),每组各30例。两组采用相同的麻醉药物和给药顺序,快速诱导插管,观察两组插管时间、插管成功率、麻醉诱导前(T1)、插管即刻(T2)、气管插管后即刻(T3)的血压心率变化及相关并发症。结果:D组插管成功率为93.3%,E组为90.0%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义。D组插管时间(26.5±7.8)s明显短于E组(42.3±5.8)s,两组比较,差异有统计学意义。D组于术后T2、T3时刻血流动力学变化明显低于E组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在颈椎手术困难气道气管插管应用方面,帝视内镜比视频喉镜插管时间短,血流动力学波动小,更具优势。
出处 《临床医药实践》 2018年第2期97-99,共3页 Proceeding of Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1ZHANG Guo-hua XUE Fu-shan SUN Hai-yan LI Cheng-wen SUN Hai-tao LI Ping LIU Kun-peng.Comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotra- cheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway and direct laryngoscope[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(11):899-904. 被引量:7
  • 2李玄英,薛富善,孙莉,张国华,孙海涛,李成文,刘鲲鹏.GlideScope视频喉镜、直接喉镜和光导纤维支气管镜经口气管插管时血液动力学反应的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(12):1069-1073. 被引量:34
  • 3Shippey B,Ray D,McKoown D,et a1. Use of the McGrath video-laryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intu-bation[J]. Br J Anaesth,2007,100(1): 116-119.
  • 4American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of difficult air-way: an updated reported report by the American Society of Anes-thesiologists Task Force on Management of Difficult Airway[J]. An-esthesiology,2003,98(5): 1269-1277.
  • 5Safavi M,Honarmand A. Attenuation of cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation-intravenous sufentanil vs pethidine[J]. Middle East J Anesthesiol,2008,19(6): 1349-1359.
  • 6Rai MR,Dering A,Verghese C. The GlideScope system: a clinical assessment of performance[J]. Anaesthesia,2005,60(1): 60-64.
  • 7Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation[J]. J Clin Anesth,1996,8(1): 63-79.
  • 8Siddiqui N,Katzenlson R,Friedman Z. Heart rate/blood pressure re-sponse and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with la-ryngoscopy,GlideScope and Trachlight: a randomized control trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2009,26(9): 740-745.
  • 9Xue FS,Zhang GH,Li XY,et al. Comparsion of hemodynamic re-sponse to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngo-scope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope[J]. J Clin Anesth,2007,19(4): 245-250.
  • 10庄心良;曾因明;陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M]{H}北京:人民卫生出版社,2005872-935.

共引文献41

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部