期刊文献+

基于两阶段DEA的空中突防兵力方案评价方法 被引量:3

Air penetration combat forces plan evaluation method based on two-stage DEA model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以效费比优选兵力方案是作战方案制定中的关键技术。以飞机编队突防作战为研究背景,用系统动力学的方法构建突防编队依次通过飞机拦截区与地空武器拦截区的兵力损失模型。将突防过程抽象为类型3的两阶段数据包络分析模型,证明其与类型1模型在效率加性分解与乘性分解上特性的不同,指出其无偏见性,并分别从两个阶段的输出与输入导向综合定义新的中立性评价方法。在仿真实验中,分别运用3种评价方法对可选兵力方案的两阶段与整体效率进行评价比较,根据任务要求,选取最优兵力方案。 Forces plan optimization with cost-effectiveness is a key technology in operational plan formulation.The forces loss model which regards aircraft penetration combat as the background about penetration aircraft fleet loops through the interception zone of aircraft and air defense weapons is constructed based on the stock-flow model of system dynamics.And the penetration process is abstracted to the type-3of the two-stage data envelopment analysis model whose characteristics of additive and multiplicative methods are different from type-1on bias-free.Then,the new neutral evaluation method is proposed from the output-oriented and input-oriented of the two stages.In the simulation experiment,three evaluation methods are used to evaluate the two stage and the overall efficiency of the optional force plan,and the optimal force plan is selected according to the task requirements.
作者 周中良 程越 寇添 呙鹏程 ZHOU Zhongliang;CHENG Yue;KOU Tian;GUO Pengcheng(Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China)
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期797-804,共8页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(61472441)资助课题
关键词 兵力方案 效费比 系统动力学 两阶段数据包络分析 forces plan cost-effectiveness system dynamics (SD) two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献78

  • 1刘佳昀,张琳.防空作战战场态势的定量化分析模型[J].现代防御技术,2005,33(6):17-21. 被引量:7
  • 2Cai Huaiping Liu Jingxu Chen Yingwu Wang Hao.Survey of the research on dynamic weapon-target assignment problem[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2006,17(3):559-565. 被引量:50
  • 3董彦非,王礼沅,张恒喜.战斗机空战效能评估的综合指数模型[J].航空学报,2006,27(6):1084-1087. 被引量:57
  • 4Morecroft J. Strategic Modeling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
  • 5Scholl H J. Action research and system dynamics: Can they benefit from each other?[C]//Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2004, 2004: 1-11.
  • 6Oyo B, Williams D, Barendsen E. Integrating action research and system dynamics: Towards a generic process design for participative modeling[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2009, 2009: 1-11.
  • 7Javalagi C M, Bhushi U M. An overview of application of system dynamics modeling for analysis of Indian sugar industry[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE IEEM, 2007: 1828-1832.
  • 8Alexandre R. The role of system dynamics in project management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 1996, 14(4): 213-220.
  • 9Forster J W. The system dynamics national model: Macrobehavior from microstructure modeling growth strategy in a bioteehnology startup firm[J]. System Dynamics Review, 1989, 7(2): 93-116.
  • 10Sterman J. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(3): 321-339.

共引文献98

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部