摘要
在适用指导性案例的司法实践中,隐性适用的现象十分普遍并日益成为主流。唯有深入发掘其成因,才能真正理解这一特殊的实践活动形式。依靠"实用考量的主观动机"和"借用案例的行动方式",隐性适用巧妙地在裁判过程中将案例遮蔽,从而规避了运用案例的说理负担。这种以实用目的为导向的案例适用活动在本质上是工具主义的,不仅有违案例指导制度的初衷,同时也与形式公正和法治背道而驰。指导性案例自身的特质决定其只能以一种看得见的方式被适用,而实现从隐性适用向明示适用的转变必然是一项系统而复杂的工程,需要在观念和制度方法上的双重努力,以最终真正实现法官在实践中想用、敢用和会用指导性案例。
In the judicial practice of applying guiding cases,there is a phenomenon called implicit application,which is very popular and increasingly becoming a mainstream.Only by digging deep into its underlying reasons,can we truly understand this particular form of practice.Based on the“subjective motivation of practical considerations”and the“model of actions of borrowing cases”,it deftly hides the guiding cases in the judicial adjudication,thus avoiding the burden of giving reasons for the application of guiding cases.This case-application practice,which is pragmatic purposes-oriented and instrumentalist in nature,not only deviates from the original purpose of the case guidance system,but also runs counter to formal justice and the rule of law.The characteristics of guiding cases determine that they can only be applied in visible forms.However,the transition from the implicit application to explicit application is inevitably a systematic and complicated project.In implementation of this project,efforts need to be made at both the ideological and the institutional levels to ensure that judges have the will,the courage,and the ability to apply guiding cases.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期144-164,共21页
Global Law Review
基金
最高人民法院2017年度司法案例研究课题"指导性案例司法适用的现状与前景"
国家社会科学基金重大项目"构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究"(16ZDA068)的研究成果
