期刊文献+

天人之学的自然哲学根基--“十天端”架构中的董仲舒阴阳五行学说 被引量:2

The Natural Philosophical Foundation of the Theory of Heaven and Man: Dong Zhongshu's Theory of Yin-Yang and the Five Elements in the Frame of “Shi Tian Duan”
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在天人之学的视野中厘清董仲舒的阴阳五行学说,不仅能为天人之学奠定坚实的自然哲学根基,也能为长久以来流行的对董学之各种?神学?或?玄学?的解说有一些新的看法。董仲舒的天人之学以圣人知天并进而与天合一为基本理论追求,以?十天端?学说为基本理论架构,天的运行之道通过阴阳、五行来展现。董仲舒对阴阳和五行的探讨都是从其自然性意涵出发,实现了对天的最具理性化的解说。在此基础上,董仲舒才能进而与人世政治进行合理比附,实现天人的真正合一。无论是论证天人相副,还是对《春秋》灾异做出独具特色的解释,甚或是构建完善的官制系统,董仲舒都以阴阳五行为其核心依据。 The clear interpretation of Dong Zhongshu’s theory of yin-yang and the five elements can not only lay a solid natural philosophical foundation for the theory of heaven and man but give a new light to various popular interpretations of theology or metaphysics.Dong Zhongshu’s theory of heaven and man takes it as its basic theoretical aim that saints know heaven and hence unite with it as one,and take the doctrine of“Shi Tian Duan”as its basic frame of his theory,in which the way of heaven’s operation presents itself through yin-yang and the five elements.Dong Zhongshu’s discussions about yin-yang and the five elements are all based on the natural significance of his theory,which gives the most reasonable interpretation of heaven.Therefore,Dong Zhongshu can make a reasonable contrast with politics in the human society so as to make the unity of heaven and man.No matter whether it is the argument about the similarity between heaven and man,or the unique interpretation of the disasters in The Spring and Autumn Annals,or even the construction of perfect official system,Dong Zhongshu always takes yin-yang and the five elements as the core basis for his theory.
作者 王博 WANG Bo(College of Basic Medicine,The Fourth Military Medical University,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710032,China)
出处 《衡水学院学报》 2018年第2期21-33,共13页 Journal of Hengshui University
关键词 董仲舒 天人之学 十天端 阴阳 五行 Dong Zhongshu theory of heaven and man Shi Tian Duan yin-yang the five elements
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1李学勤.帛书《五行》与《尚书·洪范》[J].学术月刊,1986,18(11):37-40. 被引量:46
  • 2龐朴.五行思想三题[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1964(1):46-54. 被引量:7
  • 3刘泽华.天人合一与王权主义[J].天津社会科学,1996(4):83-86. 被引量:38
  • 4郭沫若.中国古代社会研究[M]//郭沫若全集:“历史编”第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1982.
  • 5钱穆.国史大纲[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996..
  • 6侯外庐等著.中国思想通史(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1957.
  • 7梁启超.阴阳五行的末历[A].古史辨(第五册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1982.
  • 8李汉三.先秦两汉之阴阳五行学说[M].台北:钟鼎文化出版社公司,1993.
  • 9彭华.阴阳五行研究(先秦篇)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2011.
  • 10邝芷人.阴阳五行及其体系[M].台北:文津出版社有限公司,1998.

共引文献50

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部