期刊文献+

内镜下黏膜切除术与黏膜剥离术对早期消化道肿瘤的治疗效果 被引量:10

Effect of EMR and ESD on early digestive tract tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)、内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)对早期消化道肿瘤的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析运城市中心医院2015年9月至2018年8月收治的240例早期消化道肿瘤患者的临床资料,按手术方式分为EMR组和ESD组。EMR组200例,行内镜下黏膜切除术;ESD组40例,行内镜下黏膜剥离术。比较两组一般手术情况及手术效果。结果ESD组手术时间长于EMR组[(67.21±11.35)min比(39.32±6.67)min],P<0.05;两组术后住院时间比较,差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05);ESD组术后病灶残留率(5.0%)少于EMR组(32.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ESD组随访疾病复发率为2.5%,EMR组为0,两组比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床医生应准确掌握EMR、ESD的相关适应证,接诊早期消化道肿瘤患者时需根据其实际情况选择合适的内镜下手术治疗方案,从而有利于保障其疗效及预后。 Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) on early digestive tract tumors. Methods The clinical data of 240 patients with early gastrointestinal cancer admitted to Yuncheng Central Hospital from September 2015 to August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into EMR group and ESD group according to operation methods. Two hundred patients in EMR group underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and 40 patients in group ESD underwent endoscopic mucosal dissection. The operation condition and operative effect of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time of ESD group was significantly longer than that of EMR group,(67.21±11.35)min vs.(39.32±6.67)min, P<0.05. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The residual rate of lesions after operation in ESD group (5.0%) was lower than that in EMR group (32.5%), P<0.05. The recurrence rate was 2.5% in ESD group and 0 in EMR group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Clinicians should accurately master the indications for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic mucosal dissection. After receiving early gastrointestinal cancer patients, it is necessary to select appropriate endoscopic surgical treatment according to their individual conditions, which is beneficial to the guarantee of efficacy and prognosis.
作者 王艳芳 邵茉莉 杨黎黎 Wang Yanfang;Shao Moli;Yang Lili(Department of Gastroenterology, Yuncheng Central Hospital, Yuncheng 044000, China)
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2019年第1期91-93,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 早期消化道肿瘤 内镜下黏膜切除术 内镜下黏膜剥离术 临床应用价值 Early digestive tract tumors Endoscopic mucosal resection Endoscopic mucosal dissection Clinical application value
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献47

  • 1杨建民,彭贵勇,刘海峰,李向红,房殿春.高频小探头超声辅助的内镜下黏膜切除术治疗消化道肿瘤的价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(5):306-309. 被引量:21
  • 2王国清,周美宏,丛庆文,崔红海.碘染色在早期食管癌内镜诊断中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,1995,75(7):417-418. 被引量:31
  • 3周平红,徐美东,陈巍峰,钟芸诗,张轶群,王萍,王红美,姚礼庆,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠病变[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(1):4-7. 被引量:102
  • 4汪嵘,陈星,原丽莉.内镜下治疗早期食管癌及其适应证的探讨[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(3):187-189. 被引量:5
  • 5Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K, et al. Successful en bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Endoscopy, 2000, 35:690-694.
  • 6Tanaka S,Oka S,Chayama K.Colorectal endoscopic submucasal dissection:present atatus and future perspective,including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resction.J Gastrocnterol,2008,43:641-651.
  • 7A special issue "colorectal endoscopic submucosal resection".Knack and pitfall of colorectal endoscopic submocosal dissection (ESD) with special reference with the difference between stomach and colorectum.Early colorectal cancer,2006,10:489-538.
  • 8Tanaka S,Oka S,Kaneko I,et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia:possibility of standardization.Gastrointest Endosc,2007,66:100-107.
  • 9Hotta K,Oyama T,Miyata Y,et al.Techniques for and challenges with endoscopic submucosal dissection methods employing Hook knife for colorectal neoplasms.Early colorectal cancer,2006,10:501-505.
  • 10Fujishiro M,Yahagi N,Kakushima N,et al.Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007,5:678-683.

共引文献95

同被引文献108

引证文献10

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部