期刊文献+

CTCS-3级列控系统等级转换场景功能安全分析 被引量:2

Functional Safety Analysis of Level Transition Process of CTCS-3 System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对CTCS-3级列控系统等级转换场景的混成性,以CTCS-3级列控系统需求规范为研究依据,选取系统生命周期的需求阶段,研究了等级转换场景的功能安全性。首先,基于UML扩展机制,建立了等级转换场景的HybridUML模型,实现了等级转换场景的混成性描述;进而依据CTCS-3级列控系统需求规范,总结等级转换场景的功能需求,根据UML到PHAVer的转换规则,构建了PHAVer模型并验证了该模型的正确性;其次,通过分析等级转换过程,找出各相关设备可能的功能模块失效情况,采用功能模块失效描述符号(Function Failure Description Notation,FFDN)建立了等级转换场景的故障模型,并将PHAVer模型和故障模型整合,获得了包含故障的PHAVer模型;最后,运用PHAVer分析出导致等级转换场景功能需求不能满足时的功能模块失效情况,实现了等级转换场景的功能安全分析。 Aimed at the complex compositeness of level transition scenes of the CTCS-3 system, according to the CTCS-3 system functional requirements specification, selecting the demand of the system life cycle stage,the safety of level transition scene is studied. Firstly, based on the UML extensibility mechanism, the hybrid UML model is established, complex compositeness of level transition scene is described. Secondly, according to the CTCS-3 system functional requirements specification, functional requirements are summarised, the correctness of level transition scenes is verified. Then, by analyzing the level transition process, the possible faults of function modules of system components are found out. The fault model of level transition scenes is established using FFDN. By integrating the PHAVer model and the fault model, the PHAVer model containing faults is built. Finally, functional module failures when functional requirements of level transition scenes are not satisfied are analysed with PHAVer, the function safety analysis of level transition scenes is implemented.
作者 盛昭君 米根锁 SHENG Zhao-jun;MI Gen-suo(School of Automation & Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
出处 《控制工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期336-342,共7页 Control Engineering of China
基金 甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1310RJZA046)
关键词 CTCS-3级列控系统等级转换场景 HYBRID UML PHAVer 功能安全分析 Level transition process of CTCS-3 system Hybrid UML PHAVer function safety analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1唐涛,郜春海.ETCS系统分析及CTCS的研究[J].机车电传动,2004(6):1-3. 被引量:25
  • 2Leucker M,Schallhart C. A Brief Account of Runtime Verification[J]. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 2009,78(5): 293-303.
  • 3Havelund K, Rosu G. Monitoring Programs Using Rewriting [C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2001 : 135-143.
  • 4DAmorim M,Rosu G. Efficient Monitoring of Omega-Languages [C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, 2005 :364-378.
  • 5Bauer A, Leucker M, Schallhart C. Model-based methods for the runtime analysis of reactive distributed systems [C]//Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, 2006 : 243-252.
  • 6Clarke E,Grumberg O,Peled D. Model Checking [M]. MIT Press,1999.
  • 7Artho C,Barringer H, Goldberg A, et al. Combining Test- Case C-eneration and Runtime Verification[J]. Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 2005, (336) : 209-234.
  • 8Bauer A, Leucker M, and Schallhart C. Runtime Verification for LTL and TLTL[R]. Technical Report TUM- I0724. Technische Universitat Munchen,2007.
  • 9Bauer A, Leucker M, Schallhart C. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - But How Ugly is Ugly[C]//Proceedings of International Workshop on Runtime Verification, 2007:126-138.
  • 10Havelund K, Rosu G. Monitoring Programs Using Rewriting[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Software Engineering,2001:135-143.

共引文献32

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部