摘要
作为中国改革开放进程中的“政策试验田”,国家级新区肩负着引领地区经济发展、落实区域发展战略、推进体制机制创新、探索高质量发展新路的历史使命。基于2006-2017年中国285个地级及地级以上行政级别城市的面板数据,采用双重差分法以评估国家级新区的设立影响地区经济发展的政策效果。研究结果表明:设立国家级新区能够有效促进地区经济发展,并且存在1~2年的政策预期效应;中西部地区国家级新区比东部地区国家级新区能更有效促进地区经济发展;低行政等级城市的国家级新区比高行政等级城市的国家级新区能更有效促进地区经济发展;跨行政区域的国家级新区比单一行政区内的国家级新区能更有效促进地区经济发展。
The national new district,as the“policy experimental field”in the process of China′s reform and opening up,takes historical responsibility of leading regional economic development,implementing regional development strategy,promoting innovation of system and mechanism,and exploring a new path of high-quality development.Based on the panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities in China from 2006 to 2017,this paper adopts the difference-in-differences method to evaluate policy effect of the establishment of national new district on regional economic development.The results are as follows:(1)The establishment of the national new district can effectively promote regional economic development,and there is a policy expectation effect of one to two years before establishment.(2)Compared with the developed areas in the eastern coastal areas,the national new districts established in the underdeveloped areas of the central and western regions can more effectively promote regional economic development.(3)Compared with high administrative grade cities,the national new districts established in low administrative grade cities can more effectively promote regional economic development.(4)Comparing with the single-administrative national new districts,the cross-administrative national new districts can promote regional economic development more effectively.
作者
柳天恩
田学斌
曹洋
LIU TianEn;TIAN XueBin;CAO Yang(Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang 050061)
出处
《财贸研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期24-35,共12页
Finance and Trade Research
基金
河北省科技厅软科学研究及科普专项“雄安新区新兴产业集聚机制和政策保障研究”(17455329)
河北省社会科学发展研究课题“雄安新区产业转型升级研究”(201710120913)
河北省教育厅青年拔尖人才项目“雄安新区发展新兴产业的赶超路径、风险防范和政策工具”(BJ2018125)
关键词
国家级新区
经济发展
政策评估
双重差分法
national new district
economic development
policy evaluation
difference-in-differences method
