期刊文献+

剖宫产子宫瘢痕缺损孕妇再次妊娠结局分析 被引量:5

Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes of women with uterine scar defects because of history cesarean section
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕缺损对孕妇再次妊娠的影响。方法:2015年3月—2018年3月本院孕产的剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕缺损孕妇180例(观察组)和同期首次妊娠分娩孕妇120例(对照组),分析两组分娩结局。结果:观察组选剖宫产率(60%)较阴道试产(40%)高(P<0.05);剖宫产后阴道出血量(320.6±12.1ml)高于阴道试产者(181.1±6.6ml),新生儿Apgar评分(7.1±1.7分)低于阴道试产者(9.0±2.0分)(P<0.05),阴道试产成功率两组无差异(P>0.05);观察组产后出血量(181.1±6.6ml)、子宫切除率(8.3%)高于对照组(103.2±4.4ml、0.0%),剖宫产后出血(13.9%)、切口感染(16.7%)、盆腔粘连(14.8%)、子宫切除(6.5%)等发生率均高于对照组剖宫产者(P<0.05)。结论:剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕缺损孕妇分娩结局与无瘢痕缺损孕妇相当,如符合阴道试产条件,可鼓励孕妇选择阴道试产,对改善妊娠结局及降低剖宫产并发症发生率有一定积极作用。 Objective:To explore the influence of uterine scar defects because of history cesarean section on the pregnancy outcomes of women.Methods:180 pregnant women with uterine scar defect because of history cesarean section were selected in the observation group from March 2015 to March 2018,and other 120 first pregnancy women were enrolled into the control group during the same period.The pregnancy outcomes of women in both groups were analyzed.Results:The cesarean section rate of women in the observation group 60%,which was significant higher than that(40%)of women in the control group(P<0.05).In the observation group,the postpartum vaginal bleeding volume of women chosen cesarean section was 320.6±12.1ml,which was significant higher than that(181.1±6.6ml)of women chosen tried vaginal delivery,and neonatal Apgar score of women chosen cesarean section was 7.1±1.7 points,which was significant lower than that(9.0±2.0 points)of those women tried vaginal delivery(P<0.05).There was no significant different in success rate of vaginal delivery of women between the two groups(P>0.05).The postpartum bleeding volume(181.1±6.6ml),and hysterectomy rate(8.3%)of women in the observation group were significant higher than those[(103.2±4.4ml)and 0.0%]of women in the control group(P<0.05).After cesarean section,the incidences of postpartum hemorrhage(13.9%),incision infection(16.7%),pelvic adhesion(14.8%),and hysterectomy(6.5%)of women in the observation group were significant higher than those of women in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women with uterine scar defects because of history cesarean section are equivalent to those of pregnant women without scar defect.The pregnant women should be encouraged to choose vaginal delivery if they meets the conditions of vaginal delivery,which plays positive roles for improving pregnancy outcomes and reducing complications incidence of cesarean section.
作者 黄红丽 李静 黄桓 杨一 HUANG Hongli;LI Jing;HUANG Huan;YANG Yi(The Third Hospital of Wuhan City,Hubei Province,430000)
出处 《中国计划生育学杂志》 2019年第8期1061-1064,共4页 Chinese Journal of Family Planning
基金 武汉市卫生和计划生育委员会科研项目(WX18C11)
关键词 剖宫产术 子宫瘢痕缺损 再次妊娠 分娩结局 Cesarean section Uterine scar defect Pregnancy again Pregnancy outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献75

  • 1Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, et al. A descriptive analysis of theindications for caesarean section in China's Mainland[J]. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 2014,14:410. DOI: 10.1186/sl2884-014-0410-2.
  • 2Mylonas I,Friese K. Indications for and Risks of ElectiveCesarean Section[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015,112(29-30):489-495. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489.
  • 3Kottmel A, Hoesli I, Traub R, et al. Maternal request: a reasonfor rising rates of cesarean section?[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2012,286(1):93-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2273-y.
  • 4Homer CS, Besley K, Bell J, et al. Does continuity of careimpact decision making in the next birth after a caesareansection (VBAC)? A randomised controlled trial[J]. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 2013, 13:140. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-140.
  • 5Huang SY, Sheu SJ, Tai CJ, et al. Decision-making process forchoosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas inTaiwan[J]. Matem Child Health J, 2013, 17(5):842-851. DOI:10.1007/sl0995-012-1062-3.
  • 6Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, et al. Trends in cesareandelivery: rate and indications[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India,2014,64(4):251-254. DOI: 10.1007/sl3224-013-0491-2.
  • 7Lumbiganon P,Laopaiboon M, Giilmezoglu AM, et al. Methodof delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO globalsurvey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J]. Lancet,2010, 375(9713):490-499. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5.
  • 8Chen SY, Lin PL, Yang YH, et al. The effects of differentepidural analgesia formulas on labor and mode of delivery innulliparous women[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2014,53(1):8-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.039.
  • 9Jiang Y, Liu XW. Effect of new-pattem obstetrical nursing inreducing cesarean delivery rate[J]. J Biol Regul HomeostAgents, 2015, 29(4):847-851.
  • 10Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean:an effective method to reduce cesarean[J]. Clin ObstetGynecol, 2015, 58(2):309-319. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000-000000101.

共引文献389

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部