摘要
目的探讨不同病理类型早期宫颈癌表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficien,ADC)值的差异。方法选取本院2018年2月-2019年10月收治的早期宫颈癌患者117例,经病理检验确定腺鳞癌10例、腺癌13例、鳞癌94例,所有患者均需进行磁共振(magnetic resonance,MR)常规扫描与扩散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)检查,对比不同病理类型ADC值。结果腺鳞癌、鳞癌患者ADCmin(0.567±0.039、0.946±0.061)、ADCmean(0.624±0.015、0.949±0.018)等值均明显低于腺癌(0.802±0.056、1.133±0.052)(P<0.05),其余ADCmin、ADCmean、ADCmax等值对比差异未呈现统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论不同病理类型早期宫颈癌ADC值具有一定的差异,有助于科学判断早期宫颈癌类型。
Objective To investigate the difference of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) in different pathological types of early cervical cancer. Methods From February 2018 to October 2019, 117 patients with early cervical cancer were selected, 10 cases of adenosquamous carcinoma, 13 cases of adenosquamous carcinoma and 94 cases of squamous carcinoma were confirmed by pathological examination. All patients need to carry out routine magnetic resonance(MR) scanning and diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) examination to compare ADC values of different pathological types. Results Adcmin(0.567±0.039, 0.946±0.061) and adcmean(0.624±0.015, 0.949±0.018) were significantly lower than those of adenocarcinoma(0.802±0.056, 1.133±0.052)(P < 0.05). The difference of adcmin, adcmean and adcmax was not statistically significant(P > 0.05). Conclusion ADC values of different pathological types of early cervical cancer have some differences, which is helpful for scientific judgment of early cervical cancer types.
作者
卢红明
LU Hongming(Department of Pathology,Daqing Oilfield General Hospital,Daqing Heilongjiang 163000,China)
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2020年第2期114-116,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
不同病理类型
早期宫颈癌
ADC值
腺鳞癌
鳞癌
腺癌
different pathological types
early cervical cancer
ADC value
adenosquamous carcinoma
squamous carcinoma
adenocarcinoma
