期刊文献+

依托咪酯复合瑞芬太尼对妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉效果及血流动力学的影响 被引量:10

The anesthesia and hemodynamic effect of etomidate compound remifentanyl in laparoscopic surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察依托咪酯复合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜手术麻醉效果及血流动力学的影响。方法选取2016年1月至2016年5月于山西医科大学第二医院妇科行腹腔镜手术患者160例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组80例,观察组予以依托咪酯+瑞芬太尼麻醉,对照组予以丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼麻醉,观察并记录两组患者麻醉效果、苏醒时间、拔管时间、止痛时间以及气管插管时、腹腔镜置入时患者收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)等相关血流动力学指标的变化。结果观察组麻醉效果优良率为98.0%,明显高于对照组的86.0%(χ2=4.444,P<0.05);苏醒时间、拔管时间、止痛时间均短于对照组,均差异无统计学意义(t=1.875、1.631、1.761,均P>0.05);两组患者气管插管时SBP、DBP、HR等指标均差异无统计学意义(t=1.301、1.093、1.097,均P>0.05);麻醉诱导后,气管插管时依托咪酯组患者SBP、DBP均明显高于对照组(t=6.182、7.388,均P<0.05),心率差异无统计学意义(t=1.428,P>0.05);腹腔镜置入时观察组SBP、DBP均明显高于对照组(t=5.781、5.028,均P<0.05);腹腔镜置入后观察组患者SBP、DBP与对照组均差异无统计学意义(t=1.601、1.206,均P>0.05),气管拔管后观察组SBP与对照组差异无统计学意义(t=1.203、1.039,均P>0.05)。结论依托咪酯复合瑞芬太尼对妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉效果明显优于丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼,麻醉期间SBP、DBP、HR等血流动力学指标更稳定。 Objective To observe the anesthesia and hemodynamic effect of etomidate compound remifentanyl in laparoscopic surgery.Methods From January 2016 to May 2016,160 patients with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group according to the digital table,with 80 cases in each group.The observation group received the etomidate compound remifentanyl anesthesia,while the control group received the propofol compound remifentanyl anesthesia.the The anesthesia effect,awakening time,extubation time,pain relief time and systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),heart rate(HR)before and after extubation of the two groups were observed and recorded.Results The excellent and good rate in the observation group was 98.0%,which was significantly higher than 86.0%in the control group(χ2=4.444,P<0.05).The waking time,extubation time,analgesic time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,the differences were no statistically significant(t=1.875,1.631,1.761,all P>0.05).At tracheal intubation,the SBP,DBP,HR and other indicators between the two groups had no statistically significant differences(t=1.301,1.093,1.097,all P>0.05).After induction of anesthesia,the SBP,DBP in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(t=6.182,7.388,all P<0.05),but HR between the two groups had no statistically significant difference(t=1.428,P>0.05).After laparoscopic placement and tracheal extubation,the SBP and DBP in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(t=5.781,5.028,all P<0.05),and the SBP in the observation group was higher than that in the control group after tracheal extubation(t=1.203,1.039,all P<0.05).Conclusion The anesthesia effect of etomidate compound remifentanyl is superior to propofol compound remifentanyl,the hemodynamic parameters of SBP,DBP,HR are more stable during the period of anesthesia,the curative effect is clear.
作者 贾丽玲 杨建新 李雁楠 杨光 张丽慧 Jia Liling;Yang Jianxin;Li Yannan;Yang Guang;Zhang Lihui(Department of Anesthesiology,the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030001,China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2020年第1期59-63,共5页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 麻醉 静脉 妇科外科手术 腹腔镜手术 麻醉效果 依托咪酯 瑞芬太尼 二异丙酚 血流动力学 Anesthesia,intravenous Gynecologic surgical procedures Laparoscopic surgery Anesthetic effect Etomidate Remifentanyl Propofol Hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献86

  • 1吕治全,闫东.丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉对老年腹腔镜下胆囊切除术患者术后认知功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(2):289-291. 被引量:105
  • 2杨灿,王尔华,顾小萍,等.可唤醒无痛麻醉技术在消化内镜诊疗中的应用[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2014,31(9):528-530.
  • 3Ionescu D, M~u-g~it S, Vlad L, et al. TIVA-TC1 (Total IntraVenous Anesthesia-Target Controlled Infusion) versus isoflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satlsfaction[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2009,104(2) :167-172.
  • 4Stosi B, Stojanovi M, Jankovi R, et al. Implications of anesthetic techniques on patients ~ recovery in laparoscopic choleeystectomy [ J ]. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2009,66(6) :421-426.
  • 5Palanca B J A, Mitra A, Larson-Prior L, et al. Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Sevoflurane-induced Un- consciousness [J]. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesi- ologists, 2015, 123(2): 346-356.
  • 6Le Freche H, Brouillette J, Femandez-Gomez F J, et al. Tau phospho- rylation and sevoflurane anesthesia: an association to postoperative cognitive impairment[J]. Survey of Anesthesiology, 2012, 56(4): 176.
  • 7Flouda L, Pandazi A, Papageorgiou C, et al. Comparative effects of sevoflurane and propofol based general anaesthesia for elective surgery on memory[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2013, 9(1): 105-111.
  • 8Lurati BOA, Schumacher P, Seeberger E, et al. Randomized compari- son of sevoflurane versus propofol to reduce perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery [J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(23): 2696-2704.
  • 9Kaufrnan J M, Palacios S, Silverrnan S, et al. An evaluation of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool as an indicator of treanent efficacy: the effects of bazedoxifene and raloxifene on vertebral, nonvertebral, and all clinical fractures as a function of baseline fracture risk as- sessed by FRAX [J]. Osteoporosis Inter national, 2013, 24 (10): 2561-2569.
  • 10Brosnan H, Bickler P E. Xenon neurotoxicity in rat hippocampal slice cultures is similar to isoflurane and sevoflurane [J]. Anesthesiology,2013, 119(2): 335-344.

共引文献147

同被引文献96

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部