期刊文献+

PPH术两种不同荷包缝合高度治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期混合痔的临床疗效观察 被引量:5

Observation of clinical efficacy of two different purse suture heights for PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids of stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)两种不同荷包缝合高度治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期混合痔的临床疗效。方法:2016年12月-2018年12月收治Ⅲ、Ⅳ期混合痔患者80例,随机分为两组,各40例。两组均采用PPH手术治疗,但试验组荷包缝合高度为齿线上2 cm,对照组荷包缝合高度为齿线上4 cm。比较两组效果。结果:两组患者总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组吻合口出血、创缘水肿、急便感、肛门坠胀等并发症比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后疼痛及肛门功能比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组复发率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:将荷包缝合高度定位距齿状线以上2 cm的PPH手术可以明显降低并发症和复发率,值得临床推广。 Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of two different purse suture heights for PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids of stageⅢandⅣ.Methods:80 patients with mixed hemorrhoids of stageⅢandⅣwere selected from December 2016 to December 2018,they were randomly divided into the two groups with 40 cases in each group,the experimental group was treated with PPH(the height of the purse suture was 2 cm above the tooth line),the control group was treated with PPH(the height of the purse suture was 4 cm on the tooth line).Results:There was no significant difference in total effective rate between the two groups(P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in anastomotic bleeding,wound edge edema,sense of urgency and anal distention(P<0.05),the recurrence rate of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:PPH with a height of 2 cm above the dentate line can significantly reduce complications and recurrence rate,it is worthy of clinical application.
作者 李昆伦 丁永红 Li Kunlun;Ding Yonghong(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Urumqi,Xinjiang Urumqi 830000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2020年第7期85-86,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 黏膜环切钉合术 Ⅲ、Ⅳ期混合痔 2cm、4cm两种荷包缝合高度 PPH Mixed hemorrhoids of stageⅢandⅣ2 cm 4 cm two kinds height of purse suture
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1杨晓东,潘凯,王东,夏利刚,陈小春,李明伟,王晓学,钟克力.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术与外剥内扎术的对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(5):386-388. 被引量:64
  • 2修订《痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)暂行规范》会议纪要[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(4):374-374. 被引量:79
  • 3刘锋.中西医结合治疗嵌顿环状混合痔85例[J].中国全科医学,2006,9(3):240-240. 被引量:13
  • 4Madiba TE, Esterhuizen TM, Thomson SR. Procedure for prolapsed haemorrhoids versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis. S Aft Med J, 2009, 99 : 43- 53.
  • 5Ammaturo C, Tufano A, Spiniello E, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial. G Chir, 2012, 33 : 346-351.
  • 6Wong JC, Chung CC, Yau KK, et al. Stapled technique for acutethrombosed hemorrhoids: a randomized, controlled trial with long- term results. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51 : 397-403.
  • 7Ganio E, Ahomare DF, Milito G, et al. Long-term outcome of a muhicentre randomised clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2007,94 : 1033-1037.
  • 8Gravi6 JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemon'hoidopexy milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg, 2005, 242: 29-35.
  • 9Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg,2005 ,189 :56-60.
  • 10Van de Stadt J, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, et al. Long-term results after excision Haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. A Belgian prospective randomized trial Acta Chir Belg, 2005,105: 44-52.

共引文献303

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部