摘要
防卫过当行为的审判结果一直以来备受关注,其裁判文书的法律修辞对案情的描述则关系到防卫过当裁判结果的被接受度。通过分析2018年123份防卫过当的裁判文书,研究其对防卫过当行为中不法侵害的缓急、强度、双方力量对比、防卫能力及手段的法律修辞、损害结果认定的法律修辞、说理部分的法律修辞,发现其中存在说理不明、结构缺失等问题,应该构建合理的叙述场域并且注重与受众的互动,从而完善防卫过当行为裁判文书,增强司法公信力。
The outcome of excessive defense has been closely watched,its legal rhetoric of the judgment docu ments is related to the acceptability of the result of excessive defense.By analyzing 123 excessive defense documents for 2018,studying its legal rhetoric on the urgency,intensity,strength comparison between the two sides,defense capability and means of unlawful infringement in excessive defense,legal rhetoric impairing the determination of the result,the legal rhetoric of the reasoning section,it found that there are problems such as unclear reasoning and lack of structure,which means it should construct a reasonable narrative field and pay attention to the interaction with the audience,so as to perfect the judgment document of excessive defense behavior and enhance judicial credibility.
出处
《南海法学》
2019年第5期33-44,共12页
The South China Sea Law Journal
基金
2018年国家社科基金一般项目“网络服务商刑事责任边界及体系构建研究”(项目编号:18BFX104)
山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目“认罪认罚从宽司法改革疑难问题研究”(项目编号:18BFXJ04)
江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地(2015ZSJD002)资助。
关键词
防卫过当
法律修辞
行为限度要件
结果限度要件
法律说理
Excessive defense
Legal rhetoric
Behavior limit requirement
Result limit requirement
Legal reasoning
