期刊文献+

师生共创:教师认知差异与行动取向的实证研究 被引量:14

Teacher-student Co-creation:An Empirical Study on Teachers'Cognitive Differences and Action Orientation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “师生共创”作为提升学生创新创业能力、提高创新创业项目和成果转化率、将“高深学问”转变为“现实成果和技能”的有效途径,具有针对性地解决当前创业教育中存在的理论与实践脱节、专业教育与创业实践脱钩、学生创业项目成功率较低等现实问题的功能。本文基于12596份教师问卷调查的结果对教师“师生共创”认知分析后得出,需要完善创新创业政策和体制,从而全面提升教师素质、进一步加大制度化和体系化建设、将“师生共创”与现有创业教育体系进行有机融合。以期达到明确“师生共创”的组织形式,强化对“师生共创”作用的认知和发挥。 As an effective way to enhance students'innovation and entrepreneurial ability,to promote the conversion of innovative entrepreneurship projects and outcomes,and to transform“deep learning”into“realistic outcomes and skills”,“teacher-student co-creation”can specifically solve a series of practical problems with current entrepreneurship education,such as the disconnection between theory and practice,the separation between professional education and entrepreneurial practice,and the limited outcome of the student entrepreneurship projects.This study has analyzed teachers'cognition of“teacher-student co-creation”and drawn the following conclusions based on 1,256 teachers'questionnaire results:it is necessary to improve teachers'quality in an all-round way through improving the policy and system concerning innovation and entrepreneurship and further strengthening the construction of institutionalization and systematization;to integrate“teacher-student co-creation”with the existing entrepreneurship education system so as to make clear that a well-organized form can strengthen the recognition of and correspondingly the function played by“teacher-student co-creation”.
作者 黄兆信 HUANG Zhaoxin(Supervisor of China Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Research Institute,Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou 325035)
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期27-38,共12页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“新时代大学生创业的政策环境及其优化研究”(18ASH009)的研究成果。
关键词 师生共创 教师认知 教师能力 创业教育 teacher-student co-creation teachers'cognition teachers'ability entrepreneurship education
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1LaPiere R T. Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 1934, 13: 230-237.
  • 2Wicker A W. Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25:41-78.
  • 3Fishbein M. An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object end the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 1963, 16:233-240.
  • 4Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  • 5Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1985. 11-39.
  • 6Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991, 501 179-2117.
  • 7Ajzen I. TPB measurement: Conceptual and methodological considerations, http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/ tpb.measurement.pdf. Revised January, 2006.
  • 8Dawes R M. Fundamentals of attitude measurement. New York: Wiley. 1972.
  • 9Holbrook M B. Comparing multiattribute models by optimal scaling. Journal of Consumer Research, 1977, 4:165-171.
  • 10Armitage C J, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40:471-499.

共引文献886

同被引文献157

引证文献14

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部