期刊文献+

腹泻型肠易激综合征神经调节剂的选择和疗效 被引量:8

Selection and efficacy of neuromodulators for patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)患者的消化道症状、精神心理状况和使用神经调节剂治疗情况,分析、探讨IBS-D患者神经调节剂选择和疗效。方法连续纳入符合罗马Ⅲ诊断和分型标准的IBS-D患者,以面对面方式问卷调查患者消化道症状和诊疗情况,并进行汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和抑郁量表(HAMD)测评,临床医师根据患者病情处方神经调节剂,对患者随诊记录的疗效进行评分。采用t检验、非参数检验、χ2检验和Spearman秩相关分析进行统计分析。结果共纳入IBS-D患者410例,其中116例(28.3%)处方了神经调节剂(≥2周),19例(16.4%)未随访。神经调节剂治疗组合并中重度焦虑、抑郁比例高于常规治疗组(P=0.001;P=0.000);排便前腹痛/腹部不适频率更高(P=0.005)、排便后腹痛/腹部不适症状更难以改善(P=0.045)。97.9%(95/97)患者服用神经调节剂后情绪、睡眠、腹痛/腹部不适和腹泻4种症状均有不同程度改善。用药后起效时间为(0.8±0.4)个月,最佳疗程为(3.5±2.8)个月。用药后情绪、腹痛/腹部不适、腹泻改善程度与用药疗程均呈正相关(r=0.344;r=0.322;r=0.381)。最常用药为帕罗西汀和米氮平,共占78.4%(76/97);帕罗西汀治疗后情绪显著改善者基线认知障碍因子评分更低(P=0.036),腹泻显著改善者基线精神性焦虑、迟滞因子评分更高(P=0.034;P=0.028);米氮平治疗后腹痛/腹部不适和腹泻显著改善者基线睡眠障碍因子评分更高(P=0.008;P=0.003)。结论神经调节剂适用于合并中重度焦虑和/或抑郁,或肠道症状重的难治性IBS-D患者;个体化选择神经调节剂、足疗程和维持用药可明显提高整体治疗效果。 Objective To investigate the intestinal symptoms,psychological status and treatment with neuromodulators of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea(IBS-D),and to identify the optimizing selection and efficacy of neuromodulators for patients with IBS-D.Methods Consecutive patients met the RomeⅢDiagnostic Criteria for IBS-D were enrolled in this study.The IBS symptom questionnaire and Hamilton rating sale for anxiety/depression(HAMA/HAMD)were completed in face-to-face manner.The neuromodulators were prescribed and the efficacies were evaluated according to follow-up records.t-test,nonparametric test,χ^2 test and Spearman rank analysis were used for data analysis.Results A total of 410 IBS-D patients were enrolled,116(28.3%)were prescribed with neuromodulators(≥2 weeks),among them 16.4%(19/116)lost follow-up.The comorbid anxiety with moderate to severe,depression in patients prescribed neuromodulators were higher than that in conventional treated patients(P=0.001;P=0.000).Patients prescribed neuromodulators had higher frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort before defecation(P=0.005),and difficulty in improvement of abdominal pain/discomfort after defecation(P=0.045).After neuromodulator therapy,97.9%(95/97)patients achieved improvement in symptoms of mood,sleep,abdominal pain/discomfort and diarrhea.The treatment course of neuromodulators was in an average of 4(2.0,9.3)months with onset time of(0.8±0.4)months and the best course of(3.5±2.8)months.The improvement of mood,abdominal pain/discomfort and diarrhea after treatment were positively correlated with treatment course(r=0.344;r=0.322;r=0.381).Paroxetine and mirtazapine were most commonly used neuromodulators(78.4%,76/97).Patients with significant improvement of mood after paroxetine had lower score in baseline mental disorders(P=0.036),and those with significant improvement in di-arrhea had higher scores in psychic anxiety and retardation symptoms(P=0.034;P=0.028);while patients with significant improvement in abdominal pain/discomfort and diarrhea after mirtazapine had higher score in baseline sleep disturbances(P=0.008;P=0.003).Conclusion Neuromodulators are effective therapies for IBS-D patients with moderate to severe anxiety,depression or refractory severe intestinal symptoms.To select the neuromodulators,set treatment course and maintaining therapy with individualization could enhance the integrate efficacy for IBS-D patients.
作者 陆佳 史丽丽 方秀才 朱丽明 樊文娟 杨爱明 LU Jia;SHI Lili;FANG Xiucai;ZHU Liming;FAN Wenjuan;YANG Aiming(Department of Gastroenterology,2.Department of Psychological Medicine,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2020年第6期682-687,共6页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81870379) 科技部国际科技合作项目(2014DFA31850)。
关键词 腹泻型肠易激综合征 神经调节剂 焦虑 抑郁 结构因子 Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea Neuromodulators Anxiety Depression Structural factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1吴小珑,陈健芳,李奕琏,陈梦云,蔡丽梅,徐海玲.广东省揭阳地区居民肠易激综合征的流行病学研究[J].基层医学论坛(B版),2007,11(1):18-19. 被引量:4
  • 2曾淑莲,张选龙,陈建.湖南衡阳社区人群肠易激综合征的流行病学研究[J].社区医学杂志,2007,5(01S):19-20. 被引量:6
  • 3Fortea J,Prior M.Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation:a European-focused systematic literature review of disease burden[J].J Med Econ,2013,16:329-341.
  • 4Larsson MB,Tillisch K,Craig AD,et al.Brain responses to visceral stimuli reflect visceral sensitivity thresholds in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J].Gastroenterology,2012,142:463-472.
  • 5Camilleri M.Peripheral mechanisms in irritable bowel syndrome[J].N Engl J Med,2013,368:578-579.
  • 6Rostom A,Dubé C,Cranney A,et al.Celiac disease[J].Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ),2004,(104):1-6.
  • 7Egger M,Davey Smith G,Schneider M,et al.Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple,graphical test[J].BMJ,1997,315:629-634.
  • 8Hu WH,Wong WM,Lam CL,et al.Anxiety but not depression determines health care-seeking behaviour in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome:a population-based study[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2002,16:2081-2088.
  • 9Kwan AC,Hu WH,Chan YK,et al.Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in Hong Kong[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2002,17:1180-1186.
  • 10Lee S,Wu J,Ma YL,et al.Irritable bowel syndrome is strongly associated with generalized anxiety disorder:a community study[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2009,30:643-651.

共引文献128

同被引文献91

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部