期刊文献+

人工智能技术在司法裁判中的运用及规制 被引量:107

Application and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Adjudication Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 人工智能技术在司法裁判中被广泛运用,但各国有不同的态度和做法,因其不仅存在技术困境,也可能带来现实风险,包括冲击公正价值、影响公民权利、削弱审判权独占原则和与法官独立审判原则发生冲突等,需予规制。基于维护法的基本价值、保障公民基本权利、遵循司法裁判基本原理的立场,需妥善处理公正价值与效率价值、"工具理性"与人类福祉、开放理念与审慎态度、裁判方式创新与司法体制改革等四组关系。应当明确人工智能技术的定位和适用范围,加强对当事人诉讼权利的保障,适度分离司法裁判工作与人工智能产业,调整法官考核评价机制,从而实现人工智能技术在司法裁判中的规范运用。 While Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology has been widely applied in adjudication process,countries have different attitudes and practices.Because of AI technology has not only technical limits but also potential risks,including challenging the value of fairness,affecting civil rights,weakening the principle of exclusive jurisdiction,and conflicting with the principles of independent trial by judges,etc.,the application of AI technology in adjudication process needs to be regulated.Based on the grounds of maintaining basic values of the law,protecting the fundamental rights of citizens,and adhering to the principles of adjudication process,it is necessary to properly handle four groups of relations:fairness and efficiency,"instrumental rationality"and human welfare,open mind and prudent attitude,and innovation in adjudication methods and reform of judicial system.To achieve the legitimate application of AI technology in adjudication process,it is crucial to clarify the orientation and applicability scope of AI technology,strengthen the protection of litigation rights of the parties,appropriately separate the adjudication activities and the AI industry,and adjust the judge’s assessment and evaluation mechanism.
作者 郑曦 Zheng Xi
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期755-777,共23页 Peking University Law Journal
基金 2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“个人信息保护视域下的刑事诉讼领域被遗忘权研究”(项目批准号:19CFX032)的阶段性成果。
关键词 人工智能技术 司法裁判 风险 规制 Artificial Intelligence Technology Adjudication Process Risks Regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献172

共引文献3709

同被引文献1430

引证文献107

二级引证文献631

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部