期刊文献+

左束支起搏对缓慢性心律失常短期疗效及安全性评估 被引量:8

Evaluation of the short-term efficacy and safety of left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of patients with bradyarrhythmia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较左束支起搏与右室间隔起搏的电学参数、近期临床效果及安全性。方法:选取因缓慢性心律失常行永久性心脏起搏器植入术患者50例,随机分成两组,心室电极分别植入左束支区域与右室间隔部。术后1周及3个月行起搏器程控,测定两组患者起搏电学参数、QRS波宽度及不良事件等。结果:短期随访两组患者起搏阈值、感知无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后阻抗均较术中有所下降(P<0.05),QRS波时限左束支区域起搏者较短(P<0.01);术后左心功能指标均无明显变化(P>0.05);均未发生严重不良事件。结论:左束支区域起搏对缓慢性心律失常患者短期疗效及安全性良好,起搏参数稳定。 Objective:To compare the pacing parameters,short-term clinical efficacy and safety of left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)and right ventricular septal pacing(RVSP)in the treatment of patients with bradyarrhythmia.Methods:Fifty patients with bradyarrhythmia undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation were selected and divided into two groups.The ventricular electrodes were implanted into the left bundle branch and the right ventricular septum.Pacemaker program control test was carried out one week and three months after operation.The pacing parameters,QRS wave width were measured and adverse events were recorded.Results:There was no significant difference in pacing threshold and sensing parameter between the two groups(P>0.05).The postoperative impedance was lower than that in the operation(P<0.05).The QRS duration in the left bundle branch was reduced(P<0.01).No complications were found.There was no significant change in left heart function index after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:Left bundle branch pacing has good short-term efficacy and safety in patients with bradyarrhythmia,and the pacing parameters are stable.
作者 张婕 李建伟 张清 谢芳元 娄莉 ZHANG Jie;LI Jianwei;ZHANG Qing(The No.4 Hospital of Xi'an,Xi'an 710004)
机构地区 西安市第四医院
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2020年第7期844-847,共4页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
关键词 左束支区域起搏 缓慢性心律失常 电学参数 近期疗效 安全性 Left bundle branch pacing Bradyarrhythmia Pacing parameters Short-term efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1陶四明,张荣华,李易,洪云飞,杨锋,吕云,李绍龙.主动固定螺旋电极在右室流出道间隔部起搏中的应用体会[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2007,21(3):209-211. 被引量:16
  • 2祁述善,沈向前,周胜华.右室永久起搏所见的有害性、无效性及良性电极脱位[J].湖南医科大学学报,1997,22(2):174-176. 被引量:11
  • 3[1]Uretsky BF,Sheahan RG.Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure:Will the solution be shocking? J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,30:1589-1597.
  • 4[2]Brugada P,Brugada R,Brugada P.Sudden death in high risk family members.Brugada Syndrome.Am J Cardiol,2000,86:40.
  • 5Cazeau S,Bordachar P,Jauvert G,et al.Echocardio-graphic modeling of cardiac dyssynchrony before and dur-ing multisite stimulation:aprospective study[J].PacingClin Electrophysio,2003,26:137-143.
  • 6Shukla HH,Hellkamp AS,James EA,et al.Heart fail-ure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patientswith sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRSduration[J].Heart Rhythm,2005,2(3):245-251.
  • 7Padeletti L,Purerfellner H,Adler SW,et al.Combinedefficacy of atria septal lead placement and atrial pacing al-gorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachya-rrhythmia[J].JEC,2003,1189-91.
  • 8Barin ES,Jones SM,Ward DE,et al.The right ventric-ular outflow tracts as an alternative permanent pacingsite:long-term follow-up[J].PACE,1991,14:3.
  • 9盛琴慧,杨俊娟,杨平,丁燕生.主动固定螺旋电极植入术中的阈值变化[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2008,22(6):499-500. 被引量:9
  • 10吴高俊,苏蓝,方丹红,黄伟剑.永久希氏束起搏临床应用[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2012,16(4):302-306. 被引量:27

共引文献53

同被引文献105

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部