摘要
通过对"古典释义学"和"现代阐释学"的解读以及对作家与文本"误读"效应的分析,比照中国现当代文学批评史,尤其是近40年来的文学批评,可以发现,对阐释的有限和无限机制的忽略及批评价值观的游移,导致了中国现当代文学批评方法单一化。重视批评的多元性和包容性问题,探讨如何正确对待阐释学中的"误读"这一历史性难题,有助于推进重建文学批评方法论,并在文学批评史重估的过程中谋求阐释的多样性。
Through the interpretation of“classical hermeneutics”and“modern hermeneutics”and the analysis of the effect of“misreading”of writers and texts,this paper compares the history of modern and contemporary Chinese literary criticism,especially the literary criticism in the past 40 years.It can be found that the neglect of the limited and infinite mechanism of interpretation and the shift of critical values lead to the simplification of the methods of Chinese modern and contemporary literary criticism.Paying attention to the pluralism and tolerance of criticism,and discussing how to deal with the historical problem of“misreading”in hermeneutics correctly will help to promote the reconstruction of literary criticism methodology and seek for the diversity of interpretation in the process of re-evaluation of literary criticism history.
出处
《探索与争鸣》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期70-80,F0002,158,共13页
Exploration and Free Views
关键词
阐释学
正读
误读
中国现当代文学批评史
单一性
多元性
hermeneutics
positive reading
misreading
history of modern and contemporary Chinese literary criticism
oneness
pluralism
