摘要
在耶路撒冷审判艾希曼引发了阿伦特和鲍曼等中东欧思想家对犹太人大屠杀中罪恶与道德责任的伦理学对话。阿伦特提出了在极权主义政权下个人的伦理责任问题,即集体犯罪也不能免除个人伦理责任。在阿伦特的启发下,齐格蒙特·鲍曼阐释出纳粹并不是变态的狂暴之徒,而是现代性文明的产物。他认为道德冷漠产生于纳粹德国对社会距离的再生产,时空区隔和道德悬置使大屠杀得以顺利进行,而重建现代道德社会学的关键在于人对于他人的责任及其接近性、亲历性。东欧新马克思主义者对纳粹罪犯的道德拷问以及对现代伦理学重构的可能性的思考,对我国学人深入研究日本侵略者的道德伦理问题有一定借鉴意义。
The trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem triggered an ethical dialogue between Arendt, Bauman and other central and Eastern European thinkers on crime and moral responsibility in the Jewish Holocaust. Arendt raised the issue of individual ethical responsibility under the totalitarian regime, that is, collective crime cannot exempt individual ethical responsibility. Inspired by Arendt, Zygmont Bauman explains that Nazis are not abnormal rioters, but the product from modern civilization. He believed that moral indifference originated from the reproduction of social distance in Nazi Germany, and the separation of time and space and moral suspension made the Holocaust boom naturally. The key to the reconstruction of modern moral sociology lies in man’s responsibility to others, their proximity and experience. The new Marxists in Eastern Europe study the possibility of the reconstruction of modern ethics and conduct the moral torture of Nazi criminals, which is of great significance for Chinese scholars to study the moral and ethical problems of Japanese aggressors.
作者
韩振江
Han Zhenjiang(Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116023,China)
出处
《学术交流》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期7-13,191,共8页
Academic Exchange
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“东欧马克思主义美学文献整理与研究”(15ZDB022)。
