期刊文献+

基于不确定性理论的防相撞人因CREAM模型 被引量:6

CREAM model of human factors for collision avoidance based on the uncertainty theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 提高人的可靠性,可最大限度降低人为差错发生的概率,改善防相撞工作的安全管理水平。为此,基于认知可靠性和失误分析方法 (CREAM)与不确定性理论建立防相撞人因失效分析模型。首先,采用CREAM扩展法,建立认知需求剖面,评价共同绩效条件,识别失效模式,预测失效概率;然后,在无客观历史数据情况下,基于不确定性理论对专家数据进行处理,修正CREAM得出的失效概率,评估事故中人的可靠性。以管制员为主体的空中相撞事故的实例分析表明,此方法可对防相撞工作中人的可靠性进行定量评估,且过程严谨,操作性强,可信度高;还能够采集和丰富人为因素的基本数据,表明其在防相撞人因失效分析中也有一定可行性和有效性。 To make an analysis and evaluation of the human reliability in the flight collision avoidance,the present paper has introduced a human reliability analysis theory and an uncertainty theory to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the causes of human errors in the work on how to get rid of flight collisions.As it can be seen,in the proposed method for flight collision avoidance,we have made suggestions on how to raise the human reliability to reduce the liability of human errors and improve the safety management levels of the flight collision avoidance to the greatest extent.The study results we have gained can provide a theoretical support for improving the management level of human errors and the control approach to preventing the likely human errors,so as to effectively reduce the human reckless controlling factors and practical steps to heighten the anti-collision safety management level.That is to say,first of all,after comparing and analyzing several typical human factors reliability analysis techniques,it is of primary importance to select the extended version of the cognitive reliability and the error analysis method(CREAM)for the accident,so as to establish the cognitive demand profiles and identify the failure modes to predict the failure probability.And,then,in the absence of the objective history data,it would be possible to analyze the uncertainty distribution and uncertainty reliability to process the data given by the relevant aviation experts,and revise the failure probability obtained by CREAM based on uncertainty distribution based on the uncertainty theory.And,eventually,the human reliability in the accident and event which have occurred can be evaluated in accordance with the serial and parallel reliability principles.And,then,the example analysis of the midair collision accident via the air traffic controller as the main body should be able to indicate that,the model we have built up is available for quantitating the reliability of the air traffic controllers in the case of the emergency operations.And,the model we have built up is also quantitatively available for assessing human reliability in getting rid of the flight collisions by taking rigorous measures and procedures,so as to collect and enrich the basic data of human factors to increase the idealistic operability and credibility.Thus,it would be possible to verify and heighten the effectiveness and feasibility for human factor failure analysis in getting rid of flight collisions.
作者 魏燕明 甘旭升 丁黎颖 孙静娟 刘飞 WEI Yan-ming;GAN Xu-sheng;DING Li-ying;SUN Jing-juan;LIU Fei(College of Science,Xijing College,Xi'an 710123,China;Air Traffic Control and Navigation College,Air Force Engineering University,Xi'an 710051,China)
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期595-601,共7页 Journal of Safety and Environment
关键词 安全工程 不确定性理论 共同绩效条件 失效概率 认知可靠性 safety engineering uncertainty theory common performance condition failure probability cognitive reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献84

  • 1LI LuYi,LU ZhenZhou &SONG ShuFang School of Aeronautics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072,China.Saddlepoint approximation based line sampling method for uncertainty propagation in fuzzy and random reliability analysis[J].Science China(Technological Sciences),2010,53(8):2252-2260. 被引量:5
  • 2王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:44
  • 3李克武,郭建胜,周长飞.航空维修人为因素事故分析系统研究[J].航空维修与工程,2005(6):42-43. 被引量:16
  • 4Lin B, Iwamura K. Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,94(2):227-237.
  • 5Liu B, Iwamura K. A note on chance constrained programming with fuzzy coefficients[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,100(1-3):229-233.
  • 6Liu B. Minimax chance constrained programming models for fuzzy decision sysstems[J]. Information Sciences,1998,112(1-4):25-38.
  • 7Liu B. Dependent-chance programming with fuzzy decisions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,1999,7(3):354-360.
  • 8Liu B. Uncertain Programming[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1999.
  • 9Liu B, Lai K K. Stochastic programming models for vehical routing problems[J]. Asian Information-Science-Life, 2002,1(1).
  • 10Liu B, Random fozzy dependent-chance programming and its hybrid intelligent algorithm[J]. Information Sciences, to be published.

共引文献77

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部