期刊文献+

基于熵权-AHP混合约束DEA法的铁路车务行车风险评价研究 被引量:12

A Study on the Risk Evaluation of Railway Fleet Operation based on the DEA Method of Entropy Weight and AHP Mixed Constraint
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 车务行车安全管理是保障铁路运营生产安全的重要环节。为识别和评价铁路车务行车风险,从车务作业的接发列车、车站调车、中间站3个过程,结合人员、设备、环境、管理4个方面因素,构建风险因素评价指标体系。以风险因素发生的概率和后果为DEA决策变量,对风险决策单元进行评价和排序,针对传统DEA法权重自由性问题,提出熵权-AHP混合约束DEA法。结果显示,接发列车组织作业风险处于风险极大值,后面依次为车站调车设施设备风险、中间站环境安全风险、车站调车组织作业风险等,研究得出各风险决策单元的风险降低程度和风险因素分布矩阵,最后提出车务行车安全风险管理对策。 Safety management of train operation is the key to ensure the safety of railway operation. In order to identify and evaluate the risk of fleet operation, an evaluation system of traffic risk index is built from the following three processes: receiving and dispatching train, station dispatching and intermediate station management, and combined with following four factors of personnel, equipment, environment and management. Taking the probability and consequence of risk occurrence as DEA decision variables, the risk decision-making unit is ranked by the DEA. The entropy weight and AHP mixed constraint are introduced to solve the weight freedom of traditional DEA method. The result shows that the operation risk of receiving and departure train is at the maximum risk, and next are the risk of station dispatching facilities and equipment, environmental safety risk of intermediate station, and the operation risk of dispatching organization in station. The risk reduction degree of each risk decision-making unit and risk factor distribution matrix is constructed and the countermeasures of train traffic safety risk management are put forward.
作者 何景师 戴航 刘小慧 HE Jingshi;DAI Hang;LIU Xiaohui(Department of Logistics Engineering,Dongguan Polytechnic,Dongguan 523808,Guangdong,China)
出处 《铁道运输与经济》 北大核心 2020年第9期99-105,共7页 Railway Transport and Economy
基金 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金联合基金(2019A1515110909) 广东省教育厅普通高校青年创新人才类项目(2018GWQNCX001) 东莞职业技术学院科研与服务创新团队项目(CXTD201803)。
关键词 铁路车务 行车风险 风险因素评价 DEA法 熵权-AHP Fleet Operation Risk of Traffic Operation Risk Factor Evaluation DEA Method Entropy Weight and AHP
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1李相勇,田澎,蒋葛夫.道路交通安全综合评价的人工神经网络方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2006,41(4):496-500. 被引量:19
  • 2赵冬梅,马建峰,王跃生.信息系统的模糊风险评估模型[J].通信学报,2007,28(4):51-56. 被引量:63
  • 3中华人民共和国铁道部.铁运[2006]177号铁路工务安全规则[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2006.
  • 4Ashwin Mahalingam , Raymond E Levitt, ASCE M. Safety Issues on Global Proieets[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2007, (7) :506-516.
  • 5Tam C M, Thomas K L Tong. Non-structural Fuzzy Decision Support System for Evaluation of Construction Safety Management System[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2002,20 (2):303-313.
  • 6Tian Yuanfu,Li Huiming. The Studying on Comprehensive Assessment Method of Safety Achievements for Construction Enterprise Based on Muhi-indexes[C]// Tsinghua University. The 2nd CIB Chapters International Symposium. Beijing : Tsinghua University. 2004 : 63-72.
  • 7中华人民共和国铁道部.中华人民共和国铁道部令第79号铁路技术管理规程[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2007.
  • 8中华人民共和国铁道部.铁运[1999]146号铁路桥隧建筑物大修维修规则[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2000.
  • 9中华人民共和国铁道部.铁运[2006]146号铁路线路修理规则[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2006.
  • 10HELBING D, FARKAS L, VICSEK T. Simulating dynamical features of escape painc[-J]. Nature, 2000, 407(6803) :487 490.

共引文献118

同被引文献103

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部