摘要
伴随"双一流"建设进程的推进以及"建设一流大学的基础是一流学科"的观念得到学术界普遍认同,学科评价领域特别是针对评价方法与工具的研究备受关注。本研究综合运用文献计量学指标及研究主题探测方法,从学科科研产出总体情况和学科前沿研究主题分布情况两个维度,对中国(港澳台地区除外)、美国、英国、澳大利亚4个国家2013—2018年教育学学科开展评价与比较研究,力图以其为例探索和深化学科评价研究方法。研究发现,我国教育学学科的科研竞争力距离以美、英、澳为代表的世界一流学科水平仍存在一定的差距,科研生产力与影响力表现均不理想;研究领域相对较窄,但对全球热点主题均有密切关注和追踪;工程人才培养、随迁子女与留守儿童两个主题中的发文量在对标国家中占据主导优势。本研究提出需依据不同学科的特点,进一步结合并完善学科科研产出计量指标和研究主题遴选分析方法,以更好地评价和分析学科优势与短板,进而服务学科建设与发展。
Since the introduction of the“double first-class”,the academic community have been following the concept that the foundation obtained from a first-class university inculcates discipline.Further,research on discipline evaluation,particularly the evaluation methods and tools employed,has attracted considerable attention.This study compares the productivity and impact of research outcomes and topics in the discipline of education of China(excluding Hong Kong,Macao,and Taiwan),the U.S.,the U.K.,and Australia from 2013 to 2018,using bibliometrics indicators and research topic detection analyses.The research findings are as follows.A gap still exists between China and the U.S.,the U.K,and Australia regarding research competitiveness in the discipline of education.First,compared with the U.S.,the U.K.,and Australia,the productivity and impact of research outcomes are dissatisfactory in China.Second,the research field is narrow;however,China monitors the global hot spots.Third,China has published the highest number of papers in the topics of engineering talent training and migrant and left-behind children in China.The paper suggests that the bibliometrics indicators of scientific research output and research topic detection methods could be further combined based on the characteristics of different disciplines.In this manner,we can better analyze the advantages and disadvantages of disciplines,evaluate the competitiveness of disciplines,and then serve help develop these disciplines.
作者
王楠
马千淳
Wang Nan;Ma Qianchun(College of Education,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048)
出处
《情报学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第9期1001-1010,共10页
Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金
国家社会科学基金“十二五”规划2014年度国家青年课题“从类型学到分类学:我国高等学校分类体系重构”(CFA140134)。
关键词
双一流建设
学科评价
研究主题
教育学学科
double first-class construction
discipline evaluation
research topics
discipline of education
