摘要
集体成员资格是获取成员权利的前提条件,也是集体资产改革的首要环节与关键命题。由于标准尚存模糊、过程争议频发,探讨集体成员资格界定的最优模式对于当下集体资产改革具有重要意义。集体成员资格界定既需考量标准的排他性维度,也应关注过程的自治性维度。因二者的组合顺序以及强弱程度不同,将形成“封闭-自治”“开放-自治”“开放-他治”“封闭-共治”4种模式,4种模式在成员资格纠纷发生频率与治理路径上都存在差异,并深刻影响乡村治理的总体格局。对于广大农村地区而言,成员资格界定工作既需把握好资格本身的排他程度,也应均衡行政与自治的力量作用,适当、适时健全自治载体与提升治理能力。
The definition of collective membership is not only the precondition of obtaining members’rights,but also the primary link and key proposition of the collective assets reform.However,due to the fuzzy standards and the frequent disputes in the process,it is of great significance to explore the optimal mode to define the collective membership for the current collective assets reform.There exist the two internal logics of exclusiveness and inclusiveness in the standard of collective membership,and a binary power contrast between administration and autonomy in the defining process.Because of the different combination order and strength degree,four modes“closed autonomy”“closed co-governance”“open autonomy”and“other open governance”have been formed.Differences exist in terms of the frequency and governance path of the four modes in the contradiction of membership,which have a profound impact on the overall pattern of rural governance.For the vast rural areas,in defining membership,it is necessary to grasp the exclusive degree of qualification itself,balance the power of administration and autonomy,and improve the carrier and governance capacity of autonomy properly and timely.
作者
李博阳
LI Bo-yang(Institute for Advanced Study in Political Science/Institute of China Rural Studies,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处
《农林经济管理学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期593-601,共9页
Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目(18BZZ105)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC810001)。
关键词
集体成员资格
资格界定
资格纠纷
乡村治理
农村集体经济组织
collective membership
qualification definition
qualification dispute
rural governance
rural collective economic organization
