期刊文献+

电化学发光免疫法与酶联免疫法检测标志物比较研究 被引量:3

Comparative Study on Detection of Markers by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究对比电化学发光免疫法与酶联免疫法检测标志物的结果,并加以分析,本文选取2018年7月—2019年12月鞍山市中心医院经门诊诊断疑似乙型肝炎患者150例,将其分为对照组和研究组进行检测,对照组采用酶联免疫法检测标志物,研究组采用电化学发光免疫法检测标志物,对比观察2组检出标志物的检出率以及灵敏度。结果显示,电化学发光免疫法检测乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)的检出率为61.33%,乙型肝炎E抗体(HBeAb)的检出率为24.00%。电化学发光免疫法检测HBsAg、HBeAb的检出率较酶联免疫法检测更高效,电化学发光免疫法具有更高的灵敏度,能提供较为准确的诊断依据。 In order to study and compare the results of the detection of markers by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoassay,this paper selects 150 cases of suspected hepatitis B patients diagnosed by Anshan Central Hospital from July 2018 to December 2019.They are divided into a control group and a study group for detection.The control group uses enzyme-linked immunoassay to detect the markers,and the research group uses electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the markers.The detection rate and sensitivity of the two groups are compared.The results show that the detection rate of HBsAg by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay is 61.33%,and the detection rate of HBeAb is 24.00%.The detection rate of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect HBsAg and HBeAb is more efficient than enzyme-linked immunoassay.Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay has higher sensitivity and can provide a more accurate diagnosis basis.
作者 石剑雄 SHI Jianxiong(Anshan Central Hospital,Anshan,Liaoning,114001,China)
机构地区 鞍山市中心医院
出处 《质量安全与检验检测》 2020年第5期123-125,共3页 QUALITY SAFETY INSPECTION AND TESTING
关键词 电化学发光免疫法 酶联免疫法 检测 标志物 Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay Detection Marker
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献74

共引文献71

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部