摘要
清华简等文献的出土面世,为解决《古文尚书》真伪公案提供了重要契机。从用语习惯、字词演变、文意主旨、篇目差异、文体格制、历史背景等多方面对比清华简《尹诰》《傅说之命》《厚父》《成人》与梅赜本《古文尚书》相关内容,可知后者确系后世补辑之作。其最终成书时间,可能在郑玄之后梅赜献书之前。借助郭店简、上博简、清华简等出土文献考辨《古文尚书》真伪公案,重新探查其辑补、形成年代,总结南宋元明清以及近现代辨伪方法和范式之得失,可为《尚书》学研究开辟新的境界。
The unearthing of the Tsinghua Bamboo Slips and other documents provides an important opportunity to resolve the case of Guwen Shangshu’s authenticity.Comparing the contents of the Tsinghua Bamboo Slips“Yin Gao”,“Fu Yue Zhi Ming”,“Hou Fu”and“Cheng Ren”with Mei Ze’s Guwen Shangshu in terms of word usage,word evolution,textual themes,article differences,style and historical background,among other factors,we can draw a conclusion that the latter was indeed a later,supplementary work.It might have been composed after Zheng Xuan but before Mei Ze’s donating the book.With the help of unearthed documents such as the Guodian Chu Slips,the Shanghai Museum Bamboo Slips and the Tsinghua Bamboo Slips,we can examine the authenticity of Guwen Shangshu,re-examine when it was completed and summarize the gains and losses regarding the methods and paradigms for authenticating forgeries in the Southern Song,Yuan,Ming,and Qing Dynasties,as well as in modern times;consequently,this can open up new horizons for the study of Guwen Shangshu.
出处
《历史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期198-218,M0008,共22页
Historical Research
基金
山东省泰山学者工程专项经费资助
国家社科基金重大项目“出土简帛文献与古书形成问题研究”(19ZDA250)阶段性成果。
