期刊文献+

Mini-CEX联合DOPS的形成性评价模式在新护士规范化培训中的应用 被引量:18

Application of formative evaluation model of Mini-CEX and DOPS in standardized training of new nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨迷你临床演练评量(Mini-CEX)联合操作型技巧直接观察评量(DOPS)的形成性评价方法在新护士规范化培训中的应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法,选取2017年8月入职某三甲医院的65名新护士为研究对象,在岗前培训时发放《Mini-CEX和DOPS评价手册》,带教老师在1年内按规定的频次采用Mini-CEX和DOPS量表对新护士的临床护理能力进行评价。结果2018年9月共回收54名新护士评价手册。新护士入职第1年内Mini-CEX的各项临床能力均有提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。新护士入职第1年内DOPS中对相关知识的掌握和总体表现评价2项得分提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论Mini-CEX联合DOPS的形成性评价模式有助于提高新护士的临床综合能力,并且用时较短,值得在临床广泛推广。 Objective To explore the effects of the formative evaluation method of mini-clinical evaluation exercise(Mini-CEX)combined with Direct Observation of Procedural Skills(DOPS)in the standardized training of new nurses.Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select 65 new nurses in a ClassⅢGrade A hospital in August 2017 as the research object.The"Mini-CEX and DOPS Evaluation Manual"was distributed during pre-job training.Clinical teachers used the Mini-CEX and DOPS to evaluate the clinical nursing ability of new nurses at the prescribed frequency within one year.Results A total of 54 new nurses evaluation manuals were retrieved in September 2018.The clinical abilities of Mini-CEX of new nurses improved within the first year of employment with statistical differences(P<0.01).In the first year of employment,the scores of two items of DOPS on the mastery of relevant knowledge and overall performance evaluation of new nurses improved,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusions The formative evaluation model of Mini-CEX combined with DOPS helps to improve the comprehensive clinical ability of new nurses with a short time,which is worthy of wide clinical promotion.
作者 聂圣肖 孙超 王蕾 王霞 王贞慧 胡慧秀 杨雪 冷婧 Nie Shengxiao;Sun Chao;Wang Lei;Wang Xia;Wang Zhenhui;Hu Huixiu;Yang Xue;Leng Jing(Nursing Department,Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2020年第33期4692-4696,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 2016年度北京医院"科技新星"立项课题(BJ-2016-041)。
关键词 护士 形成性评价 规范化培训 临床教学 迷你临床演练评量 操作型技巧直接观察评量 Nurses Formative evaluation Standardized training Clinical teaching Mini-clinical evaluation exercise Direct observation of procedural skills
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献104

  • 1章雅青.护理学科的发展与思考[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(6):693-695. 被引量:36
  • 2彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1905
  • 3刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:52
  • 4马道斯,斯塔弗尔比姆,斯克里文.方案的评价:历史的概观[G]//瞿葆奎,主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:77.
  • 5泰勒.怎样评价学习经验的效用[G]//瞿葆奎主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:263.
  • 6Scriven,M.The methodology of evaluation [G]//Tyler R.W.,Gagne,R.M.,Scriven,M.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago:Rand McNally, 1967:39-83.
  • 7Bloom, B.S.Some theoretical issues relating to educational eval-uation[G]//Tyler,R.W.Educational evaluation:new roles,new means:the 63rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study ofEducation(part II).Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1969:26-50.
  • 8布卢姆,等.教育评价[M].邱渊,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1981:230、259-260.
  • 9Black, P., Wiliam, D.Inside the black box: Raising standardsthrough classroom assessment[J].Phi Delta Kappan, 1998,80(2).
  • 10Crooks,T.J.The impact of classroom evaluation practices onstudents[J].Review of Educational Research, 1988, (58);Sadler,D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructionalsystems [J].Instructional Science,1989,18 (2).

共引文献456

同被引文献210

引证文献18

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部