摘要
"宁海36条"制度创新通过规范村级权力运作重塑了基层民主政治生态,但实践中正式制度规则的运行面临着乡村自主性的挑战,具体表现为村干部消极治理、利用制度缝隙积极谋利、以熟人社会关系软化制度约束等。乡村自主性意味着村干部不是完全按照国家意志和制度规范行动,其行动逻辑与村干部角色特征和乡村社会性质有关。在乡村自主性逻辑下,村级权力的有限开放与普通群众有限参与共同形塑了基层"有限民主"形态。由此,基层民主建设不仅要注重制度的创新与完善,更要审视制度实践中的乡村自主性,要在制度与实践的复杂互动中逐步推进基层民主发展。
The institutional innovation of " Ninghai 36 rules" has reshaped the political ecology of primary-level democracy by regulating the exercise of village-level power. However,in practice,the operation of formal institutions is facing the challenge of rural autonomy,which is manifested in the negative governance of village officials,the active profit making by using institutional gaps,and the softening of institutional constraints by social relations of acquaintances. Rural autonomy means that village officials do not exactly act in accordance with the state will and institutional norms,and their action logic is related to the roles of village officials and the nature of rural society. Under the logic of rural autonomy,the limited access of village-level power and the limited participation of ordinary people jointly shape the form of " limited democracy" at the primary level. Therefore,the construction of primary-level democracy should not only focus on the innovation and improvement of the institution,but also examine the rural autonomy in the practice,and gradually promote the development of primary-level democracy in the complex interaction between the institution and the practice.
作者
纪芳
JI Fang(School of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430074,China)
出处
《求实》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期59-71,M0005,共14页
Truth Seeking
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“乡村振兴背景下农村‘三治’协同机制研究”(18CZZ037)。
关键词
乡村治理
基层民主建设
村级权力
乡村自主性
富人治村
“有限民主”
“宁海36条”
rural governance
construction of primary-level democracy
village-level power
rural autonomy
governing of villages by the rich
"limited democracy"
"Ninghai 36 rules"
