期刊文献+

两种内固定方法治疗成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床疗效对比 被引量:5

Clinical efficacy comparison of two internal fixation methods in the treatment of olecranon fracture of ulna
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较带孔折断式钛针与普通克氏针张力带治疗成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床疗效。方法自2014年6月至2017年1月,我们对50例成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折患者行手术治疗,其中21例采用带孔折断式钛针张力带固定(A组),Mayo分型Ⅰ型8例、Ⅱ型13例;29例采用普通克氏针张力带固定(B组),May。分型Ⅰ型12例、Ⅱ型17例。两组患者一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛评分、骨折愈合时间、内固定松动或失效、皮肤激惹情况及肘关节功能评分,并进行统计学分析。结果术后所有患者均获得随访,时间为12-20个月,平均15个月。两组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛评分、肘关节功能评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组患者的内固定松动或失效、骨折愈合时间、皮肤激惹情况等均优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论带孔折断式钛针在不增加手术创伤的基础上,有助于成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折的愈合,并在减少内固定松动及皮肤激惹上优于普通克氏针。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of breakable titanium needle with hole and ordinary Kirschner wire tension band in the treatment of olecranon fracture of ulna.Methods From June 2014 to January 2017,50 patients with olecranon fracture of ulna were perfbnned with surgical treatment.21 cases were fixed with breakable titanium needle tension band with hole(group A),8 cases o£Mayo typeⅠand 13 cases of Mayo typeⅡ.29 cases were fixed with ordinary Kirschner wire tension band(group B),12 cases of Mayo typeⅠand 17 cases of Mayo typeⅡ.There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups(P>0.05).The operation time,postoperative pain score,fracture healing time,loosening or failure of internal fixation,skin irritation and elbow joint function score of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed.Results All the patients were follow-up for 12 to 20 months,with an average of 15 months.There was no significant difference in operation time,postoperative pain score and elbow joint function score between the two groups(P>0.05).The loosening or failure of internal fixation,fracture healing time and skin irritation in group A were better than those in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion On the basis of no increase of operative trauma,the breakable titanium needle tension band with hole is helpful to the healing of olecranon fracture of ulna in adults,and is superior to ordinary Kirschner wire tension band in reducing internal fixation looseness and skin irritation.
作者 黄良善 周明客 谢作完 Huang Liangshan;Zhou Mingke;Xie Zuowan(Department of Orthopedics,Cangnan County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wenzhou 325800,China)
出处 《中华手外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期23-26,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
关键词 肘关节 尺骨骨折 骨折固定术 带孔折断式钛针 Elbow joint Ulna fractures Fracture fixation,internal Breakable titanium needle with hole
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献78

  • 1刘威,冯峰,朱明海,李东升.克氏针张力带内固定治疗髌骨骨折并发症及失败原因分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(3):205-206. 被引量:146
  • 2金东旭,安智全,张长青,王烨明,曾炳芳.粉碎性尺骨鹰嘴骨折的手术疗效分析[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(3):189-189. 被引量:14
  • 3黄永刚,秦步平.可吸收张力带在尺骨鹰嘴或内踝骨折中的应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(1):52-53. 被引量:6
  • 4Schatzker J.Olecranon fractures//Schatzker J,Tile M.The rational basis of operative fracture crae.New York:Springer-Verlag,1987.
  • 5Broberg M,Morrey B.Results of treatment of fracture dislocations of the elbow.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1987,(216):109-119.
  • 6Rommens P,Kuchle R,Schneider R,et al.Olecranon fractures in adults:facts influencing outcome.Injury,2004,35:1149-1157.
  • 7Chalidis B,Sachinis N,Samoladas E.Is tension band wiring technique the "gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study.J Orthop Surg Res,2008,22:3-9.
  • 8Candal-Couto J,Williams J,Sanderson P.Impaired forearm rotation after tension-band-wiring fixation of olecranon fractures:evaluation of the transcortical K-wire technique.J Orthop Trauma,2005,19:480-482.
  • 9Nork SE,Jones CB,Henley MB.Surgical treatment of olecranon fractures.Am J Orthop,2001,30:577-586.
  • 10Villanueva P,Osorio F,Commessatti M,et al.Tension-band wiring for olecranon fractures:analysis of risk factors for failure.J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2006,15:351-356.

共引文献132

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部