期刊文献+

拜登政府能否弥合美国社会分裂? 被引量:2

Can Biden Administration Heal the Division in American Society?
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 2020年美国总统选举使得美国社会本已存在的多重分裂暴露无遗并且进一步加剧,民主党共和党执政理念、选民身份认同、不同利益集团意识形态的差异日趋扩大。贫富差距拉大、种族严重对立、身份认同危机、特朗普推波助澜是导致当前美国社会分裂的主要因素。拜登执政后表达了弥合分裂的强烈意愿,美国国内也存在着支持“再联合”的政治和社会力量,但从目前拜登政府所推行的政策来看,意识形态分歧和政治极化仍然存在难以跨越的关卡,拜登弥合社会分裂的前景并不乐观。
作者 徐海娜 姚寰宇 Xu Haina;Yao Huanyu
出处 《当代世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期60-66,共7页 Contemporary World
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献57

  • 1Francis Fukuyama, " America in Decay: The Sources of Political Dysfunction," Foreign Affairs (Sept./Oct. 2014), Vol. 93, No. 5 (Sept. 2014), pp. 5-26.
  • 2Francis Fukuyama, Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of De- mocracy (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2014), p. 505.
  • 3George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work ( Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2002).
  • 4David Brady, and Hahrie Han, "Polarlzation Then and Now: A Historical Perspective," in Pietro S. Nivola, and David W. Brady, eds, Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America's Polarized Politics ( Wash- ington, D.C. : Brookings Institution, 2006), pp. 119 - 151.
  • 5Boris Shor and Nolan McCarty, "The Ideological Mapping of A- merican Legislatures," American Political Science Review, Vol. 105, No. 3 ( Aug. ,2011 ) , pp. 530-551.
  • 6Tom S. Clark, "Measuring Ideological Polarization on the United States Supreme Court," Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Mar. 2009), pp. 146-157.
  • 7David Brady and Hahrie Han, "Polarization Then and Now: A HistoricalPerspective," 2006, pp. 119 - 151.
  • 8Michael Barber and Nolan McCarty, "Causes and Consequences of Polarization," in Jane Mansbridge and Cathie Jo Martin eds. , Negotiating Agreement in Politics (American Political Science Association, 2013 ), p. 20.
  • 9Alan I. Abramowitz, The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy ( New Ha- ven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010) , p. 141.
  • 10Richard H. Pildes, "Why the Center Does Not Hold : The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America," Cali- fornia Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 2 (2011) , p. 277.

共引文献49

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部