期刊文献+

不同血清前列腺特异抗原水平下超声引导经会阴前列腺系统穿刺与认知融合多参数磁共振成像经会阴靶向穿刺对前列腺癌诊断价值的比较 被引量:35

The diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided transperineal systematic prostate biopsy and cognitive fusion multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging transperineal suspicious targeted biopsy in the prostate cancer in different serum prostate specific antigen levels
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声引导下经会阴前列腺系统穿刺(transperineal prostate systematic biopsy,SPB)与认知融合多参数磁共振成像(multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging,mpMRI)经会阴靶向穿刺(cognitive fusion mpMRI targeted biopsy,CFTB)对不同血清前列腺特异抗原(prostate-specific antigen,PSA)水平前列腺癌的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月上海交通大学附属第六人民医院行超声引导下SPB的患者527例,按PSA水平分为A组(PSA 4~10μg/L)和B组(PSA>10μg/L)。患者均行SPB,其中376例mpMRI检查时发现可疑病灶而行CFTB。采用χ^(2)检验比较两组内SPB与CFTB对前列腺癌检出率的差异;以穿刺病理诊断结果作为金标准,计算两组SPB及CFTB诊断前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性及准确性,并采用χ^(2)检验进行比较。结果527例患者中,最终经病理诊断为前列腺癌患者共319例(60.5%)。A组198例患者检出前列腺癌103例,总检出率为52.0%。其中SPB检出前列腺癌72例,检出率为36.4%,敏感性为67.9%,特异性为17.7%,准确性为26.5%;CFTB检出前列腺癌79例,检出率为39.9%,敏感性为75.6%,特异性为91.6%,准确性为88.8%。A组中两种方法诊断前列腺癌的检出率及敏感性差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.525、0.005,均P>0.05),特异性及准确性差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=108.340、79.829,均P<0.05)。B组329例患者共检出前列腺癌216例,总检出率为65.7%。其中SPB检出前列腺癌160例,检出率为48.6%,敏感性为78.2%,特异性为37.6%,准确性为49.5%;CFTB检出前列腺癌例189例,检出率为57.4%,敏感性为89.3%,特异性为90.6%,准确性为90.2%。B组中两种方法诊断前列腺癌的检出率、敏感性、特异性、准确性差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.131、4.391、61.339、38.982,均P<0.05)。结论当PSA>10μg/L时,CFTB对前列腺癌的诊断效能高于SPB;当PSA 4~10μg/L时,两种方法对于前列腺癌的检出率及敏感性差异无统计学意义. Objective To evaluate the value of ultrasound-guided transperineal systematic prostate biopsy(SPB)and cognitive fusion multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI)suspicious transperineal targeted biopsy(CFTB)in the prostate cancer with different serum prostate specific antigen(PSA)levels.Methods A retrospective analyses were performed in 527 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent ultrasound-guided SPB from January 2018 to December 2019 in Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated 6th People′s Hospital.According to the PSA levels,they were divided into group A(PSA 4-10μg/L)and group B(PSA>10μg/L).All the patients underwent ultrasound-guided SPB,376 patients with suspicious mpMRI had two additional targeted biopsies.The detection rates of ultrasound-guided SPB and CFTB in prostate cancer were tested byχ^(2) test.Compared with pathological results,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy of two methods were calculated and tested byχ^(2) test,and a P<0.05 was defined as statistically significant difference.Results Prostate cancer was detected in 319 of 527 patients(60.5%).One hundred and three cases of 198 patients in group A were diagnosed as prostate cancer,with an overall detection rate was 52.0%.Among them,ultrasound-guided SPB detected 72 cases of prostate cancer,the detection rate was 36.4%,sensitivity was 67.9%,specificity was 17.7%,accuracy was 26.5%,the detection rate,sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of CFTB were 39.9%,75.6%,91.6%and 88.8%,respectively.In this group,there were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate and sensitivity of the two methods in the diagnosis of prostate cancer(χ^(2)=0.525,0.005,both P>0.05),and the differences in specificity and accuracy were statistically significant(χ^(2)=108.340,79.829,respectively,both P<0.05).Two hundred and sixteen cases of 329 patients in group B were diagnosed as prostate cancer,with an overall detection rate was 65.7%.Among them,160 cases of perineal prostate cancer were detected by ultrasound-guided SPB,with the detection rate was 48.6%,sensitivity was 78.2%,specificity was 37.6%and accuracy was 49.5%.A total of 189 cases of prostate cancer detected by CFTB,the detection rate was 57.4%,the sensitivity was 89.3%,the specificity was 90.6%,and the accuracy was 90.2%.All the differences were statistically significant in group B(χ^(2)=5.131,4.391,61.339,38.982,all P<0.05).Conclusions When PSA is greater than 10μg/L,CFTB has a higher diagnostic efficiency than SPB.When PSA is 4-10μg/L,there are no significant differences between the two methods in the detection rate and sensitivity of prostate cancer.
作者 陈文颖 陈磊 郭倩 徐燕军 胡兵 Chen Wenying;Chen Lei;Guo Qian;Xu Yanjun;Hu Bing(Department of Ultrasound in Medicine,Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated 6th People′s Hospital,Shanghai 200233,China;Department of Ultrasound in Medicine,Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Suzhou 215001,China)
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期243-248,共6页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项[国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)](2017YFC0113800) 上海重中之重医学影像重点学科(上海市医学领先专业重点学科基金)(2017ZZ02005) 上海重点临床专科(上海市重点学科建设基金)(shslczdzk03203) 苏州市"科教兴卫"青年科技项目(KJXW2017034)。
关键词 超声引导下穿刺活检 前列腺癌 磁共振成像 前列腺特异抗原 Ultrasound-guided biopsy Prostate cancer Magnetic resonance imaging Prostate specific antigen
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献89

  • 1徐叶青,郭剑明,朱延军,杨念钦,王一惟,王国民.不同PSA水平的国人首次前列腺穿刺活检所需穿刺针数的研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(2):124-127. 被引量:10
  • 2高岩,闫冰,陈涛,刘流,李贵忠,罗飞,黄广林.扇型超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(10):1585-1587. 被引量:2
  • 3李贵忠,刘流,黄广林,陈涛,闫冰,高岩,罗飞,刘宁,王建伟,满立波,何峰,王海.经会阴B型超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的临床价值研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(11):828-831. 被引量:8
  • 4李鸣,那彦群.不同水平前列腺特异抗原的前列腺癌诊断率[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(1):16-18. 被引量:57
  • 5Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localization and characterization of prostate cancer: recommendations form a European consensus meeting[ J ]. Eur Urol,2011,59 :477-494.
  • 6Kajihara H, I-Iayashida Y, Murakami R, et al. Usefulness of diffusion weighted imaging in the localization of prostate cancer [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 74:399-403.
  • 7Barentsz JO, Richenberg J,Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [ J ]. Eur Radiol,2012 ,22 :746-757.
  • 8Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, et al. ISUP grading committee. The 2005 international society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic caricinoma[J]. Am J Surg Pathol,2005,29 : 1228-1242.
  • 9Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015 [ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015,65:5-29.
  • 10Amsellem-Ouazana D,Younes P, Coquy S,et al. Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study [ J]. Eur Urol,2005 ,47 :582-586.

共引文献275

同被引文献347

引证文献35

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部