期刊文献+

羊水细胞染色体核型分析联合基因组拷贝数变异测序技术在产前诊断中的应用 被引量:13

Application karyotype analysis and genome copy number variation sequencing of amniotic fulid cell in prenatal diagnosis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨羊水细胞染色体核型分析和基因组拷贝数变异测序(CNV-Seq)技术在产前诊断中联合应用的潜力。方法316例孕妇根据产前诊断指征进行羊水穿刺,同时进行羊水细胞染色体核型分析及CNV-Seq检测。结果两种方法联合检测共发现49例异常,占受检总人数的15.51%;其中两种方法同时发现异常16例,染色体核型分析结果异常而CNV-Seq未检出异常的有8例(主要是平衡易位);CNV-Seq检测结果异常而染色体核型分析结果正常25例。结论染色体核型分析和CNV-Seq检测在产前诊断中各有优缺点,二者结合可以更科学、合理地指导妊娠,避免先天缺陷儿的出生。 Objective To explore the potential of combined application of amniotic fluid cell karyotype analysis and genome copy number variation sequencing(CNV-Seq)in prenatal diagnosis.Methods A total of 316 pregnant women were offered amniocentesis according to the puncture indications.The amniotic fluid was routinely punctured,amniotic fluid was collected and used for karyotype analysis and CNV-Seq.Results A total of 49 abnormal cases were detected with abnormal results by the two methods,accounting for 15.51%of the total number of people examined.Among them,16 cases were found to be abnormal by both methods,there were 8 cases(mainly balanced translocation)with abnormal karyotype results but not detected by CNV-Seq,there were 25 cases with abnormal CNV-Seq results and normal karyotype results.Conclusion Karyotype analysis and CNV-Seq have their own advantages and disadvantages in prenatal diagnosis.The combination of the two methods could guide pregnancy more scientifically and reasonably,which prevent the birth defects.
作者 张素华 徐月新 傅丹 ZHANG Suhua;XU Yuexin;FU Dan(Department of Prenatal Diagnosis,Subei People′s Hospital of Jiangsu Province,Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225001,China)
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2021年第10期1166-1170,1175,共6页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201944)。
关键词 染色体核型分析 下一代测序 拷贝数变异 产前诊断 遗传咨询 karyotype analysis next generation sequencing copy number variation prenatal diagnosis genetic counseling
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查与诊断技术标准 第2部分:胎儿染色体异常的细胞遗传学产前诊断技术标准[J].中国产前诊断杂志(电子版),2011(4):46-59. 被引量:29
  • 2Brady PD, Vermeesch JR. Genomic microarrays: a technology overview[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:336-343.
  • 3Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2010,86: 749-764.
  • 4Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013,41:610-620.
  • 5Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomie hybridization for prental diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32: 976-985.
  • 6Shaffer LG, Dosenfeld JA, Dabell MP, et al. Detection rates of clinically significant genomie alterations by mieroarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:986-995.
  • 7Wapner R J, Marthin CL, Lery B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prental diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367:2175-2184.
  • 8American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2013,122:1374-1377.
  • 9CERRILLO HINOJOSA M,YERENA DE VEGAMC,CONZáLEZ PANZZI ME,et al. Geneticamniocentesis in high-risk populations. Experiencein 3 081 cases[J]. Ginecol Obstet Mex,2009,77(4):173-182.
  • 10YAKUT S,CETIN Z,SIMSEK M,et al. Rarestructural chromosomal abnormalities in prenataldiagnosis;clinical and cytogenetic findings on 10 125prenatal cases[J]. Turk Patoloji Derg,2015,31(1):36-44.

共引文献458

同被引文献112

引证文献13

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部