期刊文献+

郭璞注释文籍与词典之差异考论

Guo Pu on the Differences between Literary Notes and Dictionary Notes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 郭璞是魏晋时期著名的训诂学家、文学家。他现存相对完整的“四注”《尔雅注》《方言注》《山海经注》《穆天子传注》可分为词典注和文籍注两类。这两类注书在注释目的、注解体式、注解原则和注解性质方面均存在明显差异。其文籍注是为了疏通文义、辅助阅读,又暗含政治隐喻,往往采用“随文而释”的注解体式,注释内容较为单一,呈现出具体、感性的特点;而词典注则更侧重于对原有释义进行增补,多采用“通释语义”的体式,其注释内容具有多义性和概括性,较文籍注而言更为理性。 Guo Pu was a famous exegesis scholar and writer in Wei and Jin dynasties.His annotations to Erya,Dialect,Shanhai Jing,and Biography of Mu Tianzi can be divided into two categories:dictionary annotations and literary annotations.There are obvious differences between the two kinds of annotating books in the purpose,method,principle and nature of annotation.The annotation of his literary works is to improve the meaning of the text and assist the reading.He usually adopts the annotation method of interpreting along with the text.The annotation content is relatively simple,showing the characteristics of concrete and sensibility.However,the dictionary notes are more focused on the addition of the original meaning,and the method of article by article is often adopted.The content of the notes is polysemous and general,which is more rational than the text notes.
作者 王亚文 WANG Ya-wen(College of Literature,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500,China)
出处 《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第4期65-70,共6页 Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
基金 云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2021Y508)。
关键词 郭璞注 词典注 文籍注 Guo Pu note dictionary note literary note
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1黄怀信.逸周书汇校集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995..
  • 2杨伯峻.列子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1979..
  • 3徐元诰.国语集解[M].北京:中华书局,2002..
  • 4永瑢 等.四库全书简明目录[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985..
  • 5胡应麟.少室山房笔丛[M].北京:中华书局,1958..
  • 6司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 7洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 8郭璞.《注<山海经>叙》,袁珂.《山海经校注》[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 9刘师培.<穆天子传补释>序[M].《刘申叔遗书》,民国二十五年刻本.
  • 10檀萃.<穆天子传注疏>序》,檀萃《穆天子传疏》,民国二十四年南海黄氏芋园丛书本.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部