期刊文献+

从制衡到对冲:加勒万河谷冲突后印度对华战略演变 被引量:4

From Balancing to Hedging:the Evolution of India's China strategy after Galevan Vally conflict
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文主要考察了加勒万河谷冲突发生以来印度对华战略的转变过程。莫迪上台以来,虽然学界就印度对华奉行对冲战略逐渐形成共识,但本文研究发现,加勒万河谷冲突以后的一段时期里,印度对华政策实际上经历了从对冲到制衡再到对冲的演变过程。本文首先从概念层面,对制衡战略与对冲战略进行界定与比较,建立了主要的分析框架。在此基础之上,将加勒万河谷冲突以来印度对华战略划分为两个阶段:第一阶段,从2020年4—10月,印度对华主要奉行了制衡战略;第二阶段,从2020年10月至今,印度对华战略又重新调整为了对冲战略。印度战略行为调整的动因,本文认为这与国际战略环境的变化、印度对中国实力与意图认知的调整、印度国内局势变化等因素有关。 Since Modi came to power,India has gradually formed a consensus on its China strategy.This paper finds that India s strategy towards China has actually undergone an evolution from balancing to hedging after the conflict in the Galevan valley.This paper defines the balancing strategy and hedging strategy from the concept level,and establishes the main analysis framework.On this basis,India s strategy to China since the conflict can be divided into two stages:the first stage,from April 2020 to October 2020,India mainly pursues a balancing strategy with China;In the second stage,from October 2020 till now,India’s strategy to China has been readjusted to a hedging strategy.As for why India makes strategic adjustment,it is related to the changes of international strategic environment,India's cognition of China's power and intention,and India's domestic situation.
作者 李红梅 Li Hongmei
出处 《南亚研究季刊》 CSSCI 2021年第2期1-19,155,共20页 South Asian Studies Quarterly
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“印度外交战略转型及对中国的影响研究”(项目批准号:20CGJ007)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献82

  • 1俞正樑.试论美国对华的对冲战略[J].国际观察,2006(1):2-8. 被引量:10
  • 2亚历山大·温特 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年..
  • 3Kenneth Waltz, "Reflections on Theory of International Politics", pp. 327, 331.
  • 4Alexander Wendt, "The Agent-Structure Problem in IR Theory ", International Organization (1987), 41, p. 338.
  • 5Andrew Linklater, "Neorealism in Theory and Practice" in Ken Booth & Steve Smith (ed.), International Relations Theory Today (London: Polity Press, 1995), pp.256-258.
  • 6Joseph Grieco, "Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation", International Organization (1988), 42, pp. 485-508.
  • 7Dale Copeland, "The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism", International Security (2000), 25, pp. 187-211.
  • 8Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, p. 116.
  • 9Jack Donnelly, Realism and International Relations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 54.
  • 10Robert Powell, "Anarchy in International Relations Theory", International Organization (1994), 48, p.336.

共引文献196

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部