摘要
目的分析输尿管结石患者应用两种经输尿管镜碎石术治疗的效果。方法76例输尿管结石患者,随机分为治疗组和常规组,每组38例。常规组接受输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗,治疗组接受输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗。对比两组手术用时、双J管留置时间以及住院时间、治疗后并发症发生情况。结果治疗组的手术用时(44.05±5.11)min、双J管留置时间(13.61±2.66)d、住院时间(2.51±0.88)d与常规组的(45.63±5.47)min、(14.02±2.47)d、(2.74±0.78)d比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后的并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论输尿管结石患者应用输尿管镜钬激光碎石术或输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗均具有一定的碎石效果,可根据患者情况、医院情况选择合适的治疗方法。
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of two kinds of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.Methods A total of 76 patients with ureteral calculi were randomly divided into treatment group and conventional group,with 38 cases in each group.The conventional group was treated with ureteroscopic pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy,and the treatment group was treated with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.The operation time,double J tube retention time,hospitalization time,and occurrence of complications after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time(44.05±5.11)min,double J tube retention time(13.61±2.66)d and hospitalization time(2.51±0.88)d of the treatment group were not statistically significant compared with(45.63±5.47)min,(14.02±2.47)d and(2.74±0.78)d of the conventional group(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications after treatment between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy and ureteroscopic pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy have certain lithotripsy effect on patients with ureteral calculi,and suitable treatment methods can be selected according to the situation of patients and hospitals.
作者
武晓光
WU Xiao-guang(Chaoyang County Central Hospital,Chaoyang 122000,China)
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2021年第17期39-41,共3页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
输尿管镜钬激光碎石术
输尿管结石
输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术
Ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy
Ureteral calculi
Ureteroscopic pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy
